Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 Max benchmark

Name: Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 Max AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Qwen 3 Max (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Qwen 3 Max is ahead by 168 points (1,518 vs 1,350; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Qwen 3 Max resolves 67.8% versus 63.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Gemini 2.5 Pro streams faster (95 tok/s) while Qwen 3 Max is the cheaper output token ($3.9/1M). Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Previous Google long-context flagship.

Elo 1,350$10/1M out

Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.

Elo 1,518$3.9/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 2.5 Pro (3)vsQwen 3 Max (7)

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 3W (30%)Overall: Qwen 3 MaxQwen 3 Max: 7W (70%)

← Gemini 2.5 ProQwen 3 Max →

Qwen 3 Max (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,350vs1,518

Coding Elo

—vs1,526

SWE-bench

63.8%vs67.8%

LiveBench

57.1%vs69.4%

GPQA Diamond

76.4%vs83.1%

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0WQwen 3 Max: 5W

Gemini 2.5 Pro (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

95 tok/svs80 tok/s

Time to first token

210 msvs280 ms

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 2WQwen 3 Max: 0W

Qwen 3 Max (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$10/1Mvs$3.9/1M

Input price

$1.25/1Mvs$0.78/1M

Context window

1Mvs262k

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1WQwen 3 Max: 2W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageQwen 3 Max 4/6

Preference Elo

Qwen 3 Max

168 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 2.5 Pro

15 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Qwen 3 Max

$6.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,350

EloHigh is better

1,518+12%

Code Elo

High is better

—

Code EloHigh is better

1,526

LiveBench

High is better

57.1%

LiveBenchHigh is better

69.4%+22%

SWE-bench

High is better

63.8%

SWE-benchHigh is better

67.8%+6%

GPQA

High is better

76.4%

GPQAHigh is better

83.1%+9%

TTFT

Low is better

+33%210 ms

TTFTLow is better

280 ms

Speed

High is better

+19%95 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

80 tok/s

In $

Low is better

$1.25/1M

In $Low is better

$0.78/1M+60%

Out $

Low is better

$10/1M

Out $Low is better

$3.9/1M+156%

Context

High is better

+300%1M

ContextHigh is better

262k

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 56% with Qwen 3 Max

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Gemini 2.5 Pro$193.75 / mo

In: $43.75Out: $150.00

Qwen 3 Max$85.80 / mo

In: $27.30Out: $58.50

Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 3 Max is estimated to save $107.95/month ($1,295/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Qwen 3 Max:Pick Qwen 3 Max when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Gemini 2.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
3
Gemini 2.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen 3 Max

Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).

High-volume chatQwen 3 Max

Lower output list price ($3.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 2.5 Pro

Lower TTFT (210 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionQwen 3 Max

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Qwen 3 Max	Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).
High-volume chat	Qwen 3 Max	Lower output list price ($3.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Lower TTFT (210 ms).
Long-document RAG	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Qwen 3 Max	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

launchApr 18, 2026

Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

Closed flagship. Strong math. Compare to Sol and Opus on GPQA and SWE-bench, not on brand heat.

launchSep 20, 2025

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.

launchMar 25, 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro remains the previous Google long-context flagship

2025-03 row. 3.x Pro replaced it. Kept for old “2.5 pro vs gpt-4o” inbound.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen-3-max/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Elo 1,350

LiveBench57.1%

SWE-bench63.8%

Speed95 tok/s

Output cost$10/1M

Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Elo 1,518

LiveBench69.4%

SWE-bench67.8%

Speed80 tok/s

Output cost$3.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 Max?: Qwen 3 Max has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,518). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 Max?: Qwen 3 Max leads SWE-bench at 67.8% vs 63.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Qwen 3 Max output tokens are $3.9/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 Max?: Gemini 2.5 Pro has the lower time-to-first-token (210 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen 3 Max Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 2.5 Pro matchups →|All Qwen 3 Max matchups →

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (previous gemini-pro)Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3 Pro (next gemini-pro)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen QwQ 32B (previous qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen3.8 27B (next qwen)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen 3 Max Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen 3 Max

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen 3 Max benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 2.5 Pro (3)vsQwen 3 Max (7)

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 3W (30%)Overall: Qwen 3 MaxQwen 3 Max: 7W (70%)

← Gemini 2.5 ProQwen 3 Max →

Qwen 3 Max (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,350vs1,518

Coding Elo

—vs1,526

SWE-bench

63.8%vs67.8%

LiveBench

57.1%vs69.4%

GPQA Diamond

76.4%vs83.1%

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 0WQwen 3 Max: 5W

Gemini 2.5 Pro (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

95 tok/svs80 tok/s

Time to first token

210 msvs280 ms

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 2WQwen 3 Max: 0W

Qwen 3 Max (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$10/1Mvs$3.9/1M

Input price

$1.25/1Mvs$0.78/1M

Context window

1Mvs262k

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1WQwen 3 Max: 2W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen 3 Max

Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).

High-volume chatQwen 3 Max

Lower output list price ($3.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 2.5 Pro

Lower TTFT (210 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 2.5 Pro

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionQwen 3 Max

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Qwen 3 Max	Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).
High-volume chat	Qwen 3 Max	Lower output list price ($3.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Lower TTFT (210 ms).
Long-document RAG	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Qwen 3 Max	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Qwen 3 Max).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 Max?

Qwen 3 Max has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,518). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 Max?

Qwen 3 Max leads SWE-bench at 67.8% vs 63.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Qwen 3 Max output tokens are $3.9/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen 3 Max?

Gemini 2.5 Pro has the lower time-to-first-token (210 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen 3 Max Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Qwen 3 Max

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Qwen 3 Max

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Gemini 2.5 Pro remains the previous Google long-context flagship

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Qwen 3 Max

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Qwen 3 Max

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Qwen 3 Max

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Gemini 2.5 Pro remains the previous Google long-context flagship

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Qwen 3 Max

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons