CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.7 Flash benchmark

This page compares Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite wins on output price at $1.5/1M. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.7 Flash is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite). Preview until a second source matches.

$1.5/1M out

Google

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Google Aug 13 2026 workhorse. Official intro price $0.75/$3.75 per 1M through Dec 31 2026; 1,048,576-token context (Google blog).

Elo 1,530$1.875/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (2)vsGemini 3.7 Flash (7)
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 2W (22%)Overall: Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash: 7W (78%)
← Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite1 tiesGemini 3.7 Flash →
Gemini 3.7 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,530
Coding Elo
—vs1,546
SWE-bench
—vs72.4%
LiveBench
—vs69.6%
GPQA Diamond
—vs81.2%
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0WGemini 3.7 Flash: 5W
Gemini 3.7 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs215 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs82 ms
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0WGemini 3.7 Flash: 2W
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$1.5/1Mvs$1.88/1M
Input price
$0.25/1Mvs$0.38/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 2WGemini 3.7 Flash: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3.7 Flash 4/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.38/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
—
EloHigh is better
1,530
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,546
LiveBench
High is better
—
LiveBenchHigh is better
69.6%
SWE-bench
High is better
—
SWE-benchHigh is better
72.4%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
81.2%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
82 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
215 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+50%$0.25/1M
In $Low is better
$0.38/1M
Out $
Low is better
+25%$1.5/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.88/1M
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 24% with Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$31.25 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $22.50
Gemini 3.7 Flash$41.25 / mo
In: $13.13Out: $28.13
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is estimated to save $10.00/month ($120/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite:Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite:Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Lower output list price ($1.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteLower output list price ($1.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 13, 2026

Gemini Flash vs Pro: when Flash is the whole product

3.7 Flash vs 3.6 Pro is the current Google volume-versus-upgrade pair.

priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

launchAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Aug 13): $0.75/$3.75 intro through Dec 31 2026

Google’s current workhorse drop. Official intro list and 1,048,576-token context. Compare to Luna and Haiku.

launchJul 15, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Pro: Google’s current Pro-class long-context row

2M context, Pro-class Elo and coding. Upgrade path from Flash is this page, not a vibe check.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-vs-gemini-3-7-flash/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$1.5/1M
Google

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Elo 1,530
LiveBench69.6%
SWE-bench72.4%
Speed215 tok/s
Output cost$1.88/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite output tokens are $1.5/1M versus $1.88/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemini 3.7 Flash Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini Flash vs Pro: when Flash is the whole product

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

  • launch · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.7 Flash (Aug 13): $0.75/$3.75 intro through Dec 31 2026

  • launch · Jul 15, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Pro: Google’s current Pro-class long-context row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite matchups →|All Gemini 3.7 Flash matchups →
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.6 Pro vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.7 Flash