CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.6 benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Grok 4.6 is ahead by 86 points (1,592 vs 1,506; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash resolves 70.8% versus 69.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.6 Flash streams faster (198 tok/s) while Gemini 3.6 Flash is the cheaper output token ($3.75/1M). Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.6 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Grok 4.6 leads preference Elo (1,592 vs 1,506). Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 3.6 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

Elo 1,506$3.75/1M out

xAI

Grok 4.6

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

Elo 1,592$6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (6)vsGrok 4.6 (4)
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 6W (60%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashGrok 4.6: 4W (40%)
← Gemini 3.6 FlashGrok 4.6 →
Grok 4.6 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,506vs1,592
Coding Elo
1,514vs1,568
SWE-bench
70.8%vs69.1%
LiveBench
67.2%vs71.4%
GPQA Diamond
79.6%vs84.6%
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1WGrok 4.6: 4W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
198 tok/svs118 tok/s
Time to first token
92 msvs195 ms
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WGrok 4.6: 0W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$3.75/1Mvs$6/1M
Input price
$0.75/1Mvs$2/1M
Context window
1Mvs500k
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 3WGrok 4.6: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

Grok 4.6

86 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3.6 Flash

80 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 3.6 Flash

$2.25/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,506
EloHigh is better
1,592+6%
Code Elo
High is better
1,514
Code EloHigh is better
1,568+4%
LiveBench
High is better
67.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
71.4%+6%
SWE-bench
High is better
+2%70.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
69.1%
GPQA
High is better
79.6%
GPQAHigh is better
84.6%+6%
TTFT
Low is better
+112%92 ms
TTFTLow is better
195 ms
Speed
High is better
+68%198 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
118 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+167%$0.75/1M
In $Low is better
$2/1M
Out $
Low is better
+60%$3.75/1M
Out $Low is better
$6/1M
Context
High is better
+110%1M
ContextHigh is better
500k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 48% with Gemini 3.6 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo
In: $26.25Out: $56.25
Grok 4.6$160.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $90.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3.6 Flash is estimated to save $77.50/month ($930/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).

High-volume chatGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower output list price ($3.75/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 FlashHigher SWE-bench (70.8%).
High-volume chatGemini 3.6 FlashLower output list price ($3.75/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 FlashLower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

launchAug 12, 2026

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

xAI’s Aug 12 2026 refresh of Grok 4.5. 500k context. The Grok vs ChatGPT hub remaps here.

launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-6-flash-vs-grok-4-6/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench70.8%
Speed198 tok/s
Output cost$3.75/1M
xAI

Grok 4.6

Elo 1,592
LiveBench71.4%
SWE-bench69.1%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,592). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Grok 4.6?
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench at 70.8% vs 69.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3.6 Flash output tokens are $3.75/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Grok 4.6?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 195 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 500k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Grok 4.6 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • launch · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →|All Grok 4.6 matchups →
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4 (previous grok)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3 Pro vs Grok 4.6Gemini 3.6 Pro vs Grok 4.6