CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi Chat 1.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi Chat 1.5 benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) and Kimi Chat 1.5 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3.6 Flash is ahead by 86 points (1,506 vs 1,420; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash resolves 70.8% versus 51% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.6 Flash streams faster (198 tok/s) while Kimi Chat 1.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.8/1M). Kimi Chat 1.5 has the larger context window (2M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi Chat 1.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 3.6 Flash leads preference Elo (1,506 vs 1,420). Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. Kimi Chat 1.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

Elo 1,506$3.75/1M out

Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

Elo 1,420$0.8/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (7)vsKimi Chat 1.5 (3)
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 7W (70%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashKimi Chat 1.5: 3W (30%)
← Gemini 3.6 FlashKimi Chat 1.5 →
Gemini 3.6 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,506vs1,420
Coding Elo
1,514vs1,390
SWE-bench
70.8%vs51%
LiveBench
67.2%vs58%
GPQA Diamond
79.6%vs71.5%
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 5WKimi Chat 1.5: 0W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
198 tok/svs95 tok/s
Time to first token
92 msvs210 ms
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WKimi Chat 1.5: 0W
Kimi Chat 1.5 (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$3.75/1Mvs$0.8/1M
Input price
$0.75/1Mvs$0.2/1M
Context window
1Mvs2M
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0WKimi Chat 1.5: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3.6 Flash 4/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 3.6 Flash

86 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3.6 Flash

103 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Kimi Chat 1.5

$2.95/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+6%1,506
EloHigh is better
1,420
Code Elo
High is better
+9%1,514
Code EloHigh is better
1,390
LiveBench
High is better
+16%67.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
58%
SWE-bench
High is better
+39%70.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
51%
GPQA
High is better
+11%79.6%
GPQAHigh is better
71.5%
TTFT
Low is better
+128%92 ms
TTFTLow is better
210 ms
Speed
High is better
+108%198 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
95 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$0.75/1M
In $Low is better
$0.2/1M+275%
Out $
Low is better
$3.75/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.8/1M+369%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
2M+91%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 77% with Kimi Chat 1.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo
In: $26.25Out: $56.25
Kimi Chat 1.5$19.00 / mo
In: $7.00Out: $12.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Kimi Chat 1.5 is estimated to save $63.50/month ($762/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Kimi Chat 1.5:Pick Kimi Chat 1.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).

High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 FlashHigher SWE-bench (70.8%).
High-volume chatKimi Chat 1.5Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 FlashLower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAGKimi Chat 1.5Larger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-6-flash-vs-kimi-1-5-long/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench70.8%
Speed198 tok/s
Output cost$3.75/1M
Moonshot

Kimi Chat 1.5

Elo 1,420
LiveBench58%
SWE-bench51%
Speed95 tok/s
Output cost$0.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Kimi Chat 1.5?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,506). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Kimi Chat 1.5?
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench at 70.8% vs 51%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Kimi Chat 1.5 output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $3.75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Kimi Chat 1.5?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 210 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Kimi Chat 1.5 accepts 2M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Kimi Chat 1.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →|All Kimi Chat 1.5 matchups →
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Kimi Chat 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (next kimi)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.6 FlashKimi K3 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash