CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3.6 Flash is ahead by 81 points (1,506 vs 1,425; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash resolves 70.8% versus 65.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.6 Flash streams faster (198 tok/s) while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is the cheaper output token ($0.72/1M). Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 3.6 Flash leads preference Elo (1,506 vs 1,425). Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

Elo 1,506$3.75/1M out

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

Elo 1,425$0.72/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (8)vsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B (2)
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 8W (80%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 2W (20%)
← Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen 2.5 Coder 32B →
Gemini 3.6 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,506vs1,425
Coding Elo
1,514vs1,495
SWE-bench
70.8%vs65.2%
LiveBench
67.2%vs64.8%
GPQA Diamond
79.6%vs74%
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 5WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 0W
Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
198 tok/svs110 tok/s
Time to first token
92 msvs180 ms
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 0W
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$3.75/1Mvs$0.72/1M
Input price
$0.75/1Mvs$0.18/1M
Context window
1Mvs131k
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1WQwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3.6 Flash 5/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 3.6 Flash

81 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3.6 Flash

88 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

$3.03/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+6%1,506
EloHigh is better
1,425
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,514
Code EloHigh is better
1,495
LiveBench
High is better
+4%67.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.8%
SWE-bench
High is better
+9%70.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
65.2%
GPQA
High is better
+8%79.6%
GPQAHigh is better
74%
TTFT
Low is better
+96%92 ms
TTFTLow is better
180 ms
Speed
High is better
+80%198 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
110 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$0.75/1M
In $Low is better
$0.18/1M+317%
Out $
Low is better
$3.75/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.72/1M+421%
Context
High is better
+700%1M
ContextHigh is better
131k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 79% with Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo
In: $26.25Out: $56.25
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$17.10 / mo
In: $6.30Out: $10.80
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is estimated to save $65.40/month ($785/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B:Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).

High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Lower output list price ($0.72/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 FlashHigher SWE-bench (70.8%).
High-volume chatQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLower output list price ($0.72/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 FlashLower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-6-flash-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench70.8%
Speed198 tok/s
Output cost$3.75/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Elo 1,425
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed110 tok/s
Output cost$0.72/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,506). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench at 70.8% vs 65.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B output tokens are $0.72/1M versus $3.75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 180 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →|All Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B matchups →
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen3 235B (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen 3 Max vs Gemini 3.6 Flash