Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026
This page compares Gemini 3.6 Pro (Google) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Sol is ahead by 38 points (1,608 vs 1,570; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Sol resolves 77.6% versus 74.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.6 Pro streams faster (102 tok/s) while Gemini 3.6 Pro is the cheaper output token ($5/1M). Gemini 3.6 Pro has the larger context window (2M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Current Google Pro-class multimodal model. Long context, strong coding, billed like the 3.x Pro tier.
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
38 pts advantage
18 tok/s faster
$25.00/1M cheaper
Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.
Gemini 3.6 Pro is estimated to save $506.25/month ($6,075/year).
Higher SWE-bench (77.6%).
Lower output list price ($5/1M).
Lower TTFT (205 ms).
Larger window (2M).
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | GPT-5.6 Sol | Higher SWE-bench (77.6%). |
| High-volume chat | Gemini 3.6 Pro | Lower output list price ($5/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 3.6 Pro | Lower TTFT (205 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 3.6 Pro | Larger window (2M). |
| Screenshots / vision | GPT-5.6 Sol | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol). |
3.7 Flash vs 3.6 Pro is the current Google volume-versus-upgrade pair.
Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.
Top Anthropic vs top Google. Usually Opus 5 vs 3.6 Pro. Two different invoices.
Not a frozen 2025 article. Today that is usually Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. Dated cells, not a brand fight.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-6-pro-vs-gpt-5-6-sol/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
compare · Jul 16, 2026
Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice
compare · Aug 13, 2026
Gemini Flash vs Pro: when Flash is the whole product
compare · Aug 12, 2026
Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest
compare · Jul 24, 2026
Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup