CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Sol is ahead by 78 points (1,608 vs 1,530; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Sol resolves 77.6% versus 72.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.7 Flash streams faster (215 tok/s) while Gemini 3.7 Flash is the cheaper output token ($1.88/1M). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5.6 Sol leads preference Elo (1,608 vs 1,530). GPT-5.6 Sol leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 3.7 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Google Aug 13 2026 workhorse. Official intro price $0.75/$3.75 per 1M through Dec 31 2026; 1,048,576-token context (Google blog).

Elo 1,530$1.875/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).

Elo 1,608$30/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3.7 Flash (4)vsGPT-5.6 Sol (6)
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 4W (40%)Overall: GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol: 6W (60%)
← Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol →
GPT-5.6 Sol (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,530vs1,608
Coding Elo
1,546vs1,602
SWE-bench
72.4%vs77.6%
LiveBench
69.6%vs73.9%
GPQA Diamond
81.2%vs86.8%
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0WGPT-5.6 Sol: 5W
Gemini 3.7 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
215 tok/svs84 tok/s
Time to first token
82 msvs270 ms
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 2WGPT-5.6 Sol: 0W
Gemini 3.7 Flash (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$1.88/1Mvs$30/1M
Input price
$0.38/1Mvs$5/1M
Context window
1Mvs1.1M
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 2WGPT-5.6 Sol: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Sol 4/6
Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Sol

78 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3.7 Flash

131 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 3.7 Flash

$28.13/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,530
EloHigh is better
1,608+5%
Code Elo
High is better
1,546
Code EloHigh is better
1,602+4%
LiveBench
High is better
69.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
73.9%+6%
SWE-bench
High is better
72.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
77.6%+7%
GPQA
High is better
81.2%
GPQAHigh is better
86.8%+7%
TTFT
Low is better
+229%82 ms
TTFTLow is better
270 ms
Speed
High is better
+156%215 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
84 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+1233%$0.38/1M
In $Low is better
$5/1M
Out $
Low is better
+1500%$1.88/1M
Out $Low is better
$30/1M
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1.1M
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 93% with Gemini 3.7 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3.7 Flash$41.25 / mo
In: $13.13Out: $28.13
GPT-5.6 Sol$625.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $450.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3.7 Flash is estimated to save $583.75/month ($7,005/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Sol:Pick GPT-5.6 Sol when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3.7 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 3.7 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Sol

Higher SWE-bench (77.6%).

High-volume chatGemini 3.7 Flash

Lower output list price ($1.88/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.7 Flash

Lower TTFT (82 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Sol

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Sol

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 SolHigher SWE-bench (77.6%).
High-volume chatGemini 3.7 FlashLower output list price ($1.88/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.7 FlashLower TTFT (82 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 SolLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 SolBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 13, 2026

Gemini Flash vs Pro: when Flash is the whole product

3.7 Flash vs 3.6 Pro is the current Google volume-versus-upgrade pair.

priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

launchAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.7 Flash (Aug 13): $0.75/$3.75 intro through Dec 31 2026

Google’s current workhorse drop. Official intro list and 1,048,576-token context. Compare to Luna and Haiku.

compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-gpt-5-6-sol/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Elo 1,530
LiveBench69.6%
SWE-bench72.4%
Speed215 tok/s
Output cost$1.88/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

Elo 1,608
LiveBench73.9%
SWE-bench77.6%
Speed84 tok/s
Output cost$30/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,608). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol leads SWE-bench at 77.6% vs 72.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3.7 Flash output tokens are $1.88/1M versus $30/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Gemini 3.7 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (82 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1.1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.6 Sol Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini Flash vs Pro: when Flash is the whole product

  • price · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

  • launch · Aug 13, 2026

    Gemini 3.7 Flash (Aug 13): $0.75/$3.75 intro through Dec 31 2026

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3.7 Flash matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Sol matchups →
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (previous gemini-flash)GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5 (previous gpt-flagship)GPT-4.5 Orion vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash