CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5.3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5.3 benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3 Pro (Google) and GLM-5.3 (Zhipu) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GLM-5.3 is ahead by 6 points (1,558 vs 1,552; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GLM-5.3 resolves 76.4% versus 72.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3 Pro streams faster (92 tok/s) while GLM-5.3 is the cheaper output token ($1.8/1M). Gemini 3 Pro has the larger context window (2M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5.3 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GLM-5.3 leads preference Elo (1,558 vs 1,552). GLM-5.3 leads SWE-bench coding. GLM-5.3 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Google frontier multimodal model with a multi-million-token context window.

Elo 1,552$5/1M out

Zhipu

GLM-5.3

Z.ai Aug 14 2026 post-train of the GLM-5.2 744B base. Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review (z.ai/blog/glm-5.3).

Elo 1,558$1.8/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3 Pro (4)vsGLM-5.3 (6)
Gemini 3 Pro: 4W (40%)Overall: GLM-5.3GLM-5.3: 6W (60%)
← Gemini 3 ProGLM-5.3 →
GLM-5.3 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,552vs1,558
Coding Elo
1,548vs1,586
SWE-bench
72.4%vs76.4%
LiveBench
70.6%vs70.8%
GPQA Diamond
83.6%vs83.2%
Gemini 3 Pro: 1WGLM-5.3: 4W
Gemini 3 Pro (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
92 tok/svs90 tok/s
Time to first token
220 msvs255 ms
Gemini 3 Pro: 2WGLM-5.3: 0W
GLM-5.3 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$5/1Mvs$1.8/1M
Input price
$1.25/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Context window
2Mvs200k
Gemini 3 Pro: 1WGLM-5.3: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGLM-5.3 3/6
Preference Elo

GLM-5.3

6 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3 Pro

2 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GLM-5.3

$3.20/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,552
EloHigh is better
1,558
Code Elo
High is better
1,548
Code EloHigh is better
1,586+2%
LiveBench
High is better
70.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
70.8%
SWE-bench
High is better
72.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
76.4%+6%
GPQA
High is better
83.6%
GPQAHigh is better
83.2%
TTFT
Low is better
+16%220 ms
TTFTLow is better
255 ms
Speed
High is better
+2%92 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
90 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$1.25/1M
In $Low is better
$0.5/1M+150%
Out $
Low is better
$5/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.8/1M+178%
Context
High is better
+900%2M
ContextHigh is better
200k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 63% with GLM-5.3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3 Pro$118.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $75.00
GLM-5.3$44.50 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $27.00
Estimated Cost Delta

GLM-5.3 is estimated to save $74.25/month ($891/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GLM-5.3:Pick GLM-5.3 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3 Pro:Pick Gemini 3 Pro when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 3 Pro:Pick Gemini 3 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGLM-5.3

Higher SWE-bench (76.4%).

High-volume chatGLM-5.3

Lower output list price ($1.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 Pro

Lower TTFT (220 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3 Pro

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionGLM-5.3

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GLM-5.3).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGLM-5.3Higher SWE-bench (76.4%).
High-volume chatGLM-5.3Lower output list price ($1.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 ProLower TTFT (220 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3 ProLarger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionGLM-5.3Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GLM-5.3).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 14, 2026

GLM-5.3 (Aug 14): Z.ai post-train of the 5.2 744B base

Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review. Newest Zhipu row.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

launchMar 15, 2026

Gemini 3 Pro’s multi-million context is still a 2026 RAG shortlist

March 2026 Google frontier multimodal with a 2M window. 3.6 Pro is newer; 3 Pro stays as the original 3.x Pro row.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-pro-vs-glm-5-3/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Elo 1,552
LiveBench70.6%
SWE-bench72.4%
Speed92 tok/s
Output cost$5/1M
Zhipu

GLM-5.3

Elo 1,558
LiveBench70.8%
SWE-bench76.4%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$1.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,558). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 leads SWE-bench at 76.4% vs 72.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GLM-5.3 output tokens are $1.8/1M versus $5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-5.3?
Gemini 3 Pro has the lower time-to-first-token (220 ms vs 255 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 2M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3 Pro and GLM-5.3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 14, 2026

    GLM-5.3 (Aug 14): Z.ai post-train of the 5.2 744B base

  • launch · Jun 18, 2026

    GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

  • launch · Mar 15, 2026

    Gemini 3 Pro’s multi-million context is still a 2026 RAG shortlist

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3 Pro matchups →|All GLM-5.3 matchups →
Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (previous gemini-pro)Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Pro (next gemini-pro)GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.2 (previous glm)Gemini 3.6 Pro vs GLM-5.3Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3 ProGemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Pro