CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Google: Gemma 3n 4B vs OpenAI: o1
Independent ReportPairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
noindex (thin pair)
Google: Gemma 3n 4B(Google)
vs
OpenAI: o1(OpenAI)

Google: Gemma 3n 4B vs OpenAI: o1 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Google: Gemma 3n 4B is more budget-friendly at $0.12/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Google: Gemma 3n 4B and OpenAI: o1 present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Google: Gemma 3n 4B holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
OpenAI: o1Top code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
OpenAI: o1Top logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Google: Gemma 3n 4BLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
OpenAI: o1Fastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Google: Gemma 3n 4B (2)OpenAI: o1 (1)
Google: Gemma 3n 4B
2 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
OpenAI: o1
1 of 3 Wins
✓Context window
Google
Leads 2 of 3
Google: Gemma 3n 4B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-3n-e4b-it). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.06 · Out: $0.12/1M
OpenAI
Leads 1 of 3
OpenAI: o1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o1). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,512In: $15 · Out: $60/1M

OpenAI: o1 Thinking Depth & Cost Scaler

Model B

Simulate accuracy gains vs added response time & token cost

Mode: Medium (Standard)

Reasoning models “think before answering” by generating internal reasoning tokens. Higher effort improves math, coding, and logic accuracy, but increases response delay and token costs.

Delay
420 ms
Standard
CoT Tokens
~1,500
Internal reasoning
Cost / 1k
$115.50
4.5× base bill
Accuracy Boost
+4.5%
STEM & Logic
Top Rival Showdowns for Google: Gemma 3n 4B
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderGoogle: Gemma 3n 4B Wins

Google: Gemma 3n 4B

$0.12 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Google: Gemma 3n 4B (2)vsOpenAI: o1 (8)
Google: Gemma 3n 4B: 2W (20%)Overall: OpenAI: o1OpenAI: o1: 8W (80%)
← Google: Gemma 3n 4BOpenAI: o1 →
🏆OpenAI: o1 Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 3n 4BvsOpenAI: o1
Preference Elo
—vs1,512
Coding Elo
—vs1,485
SWE-bench
—vs48.9%
LiveBench
—vs65.4%
GPQA Diamond
—vs78%
Google: Gemma 3n 4B: 0WOpenAI: o1: 5W
🏆OpenAI: o1 Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 3n 4BvsOpenAI: o1
Output speed
—vs45 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs420 ms
Google: Gemma 3n 4B: 0WOpenAI: o1: 2W
🏆Google: Gemma 3n 4B Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Google: Gemma 3n 4BvsOpenAI: o1
Output price
$0.12/1Mvs$60/1M+$59.88/1M
Input price
$0.06/1Mvs$15/1M+$14.94/1M
Context window
33kvs200k+167k
Google: Gemma 3n 4B: 2WOpenAI: o1: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Google: Gemma 3n 4BOpenAI: o1
Preference Elo
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o11,512
Coding Elo
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o11,485
LiveBench
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o165.4%
SWE-bench
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o148.9%
GPQA Diamond
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o178%
Time to first token
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o1420 ms
Output speed
Google: Gemma 3n 4B—
OpenAI: o145 tok/s
Input priceGoogle: Gemma 3n 4B +$14.94/1M
Google: Gemma 3n 4B$0.06/1M
OpenAI: o1$15/1M
Output priceGoogle: Gemma 3n 4B +$59.88/1M
Google: Gemma 3n 4B$0.12/1M
OpenAI: o1$60/1M
Context windowOpenAI: o1 +167k
Google: Gemma 3n 4B33k
OpenAI: o1200k
BenchmarkGoogle: Gemma 3n 4BOpenAI: o1Advantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,512
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,485
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
65.4%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
48.9%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
78%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
420 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
45 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.06/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$14.94/1M
Output price
$0.12/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$60/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$59.88/1M
Context window
33k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+167k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 100% with Google: Gemma 3n 4B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Google: Gemma 3n 4B$3.90 / mo
In: $2.1Out: $1.8
OpenAI: o1$1,425.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $900
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Gemma 3n 4B is estimated to save $1,421.10/month ($17,053/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemma 3n 4B:Pick Google: Gemma 3n 4B when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 3n 4B

Lower output list price ($0.12/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGOpenAI: o1

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1

OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemma 3n 4BLower output list price ($0.12/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGOpenAI: o1Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-o1/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Google

Google: Gemma 3n 4B

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)33k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.06/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.12/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI: o1

Elo 1,512
SWE-bench48.9%
Speed (tok/s)45 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$60/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Google: Gemma 3n 4B or OpenAI: o1?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Google: Gemma 3n 4B or OpenAI: o1?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemma 3n 4B output tokens are $0.12/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Google: Gemma 3n 4B or OpenAI: o1?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI: o1 accepts 200k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Google: Gemma 3n 4B and OpenAI: o1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Google: Gemma 3n 4B matchups →|All OpenAI: o1 matchups →
OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)GPT-5 vs OpenAI: o1Gemini 3 Pro vs OpenAI: o1Gemini 3 Flash vs OpenAI: o1Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs OpenAI: o1