Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,475 vs 1,425), while Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is more budget-friendly at $0.72/1M per 1M output tokens, while Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo provides faster response streaming (112 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (z-ai/glm-5v-turbo). Preview until a second source matches.
Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.
Δ 50 Arena Elo pts
112 tok/s
$0.72 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (+50) | ||
| Coding Elo | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+13) | ||
| LiveBench | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+1%) | ||
| SWE-bench | — | ||
| GPQA Diamond | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (+3.4%) | ||
| Time to first token | — | ||
| Output speed | 112 tok/s | 110 tok/s | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (+2 tok/s) |
| Input price | $1.2/1M | $0.18/1M | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+$1.02/1M) |
| Output price | $0.72/1M | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+$3.28/1M) | |
| Context window | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (+72k) |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is estimated to save $84.90/month ($1,019/year).
Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
Lower output list price ($0.72/1M).
Lower TTFT (180 ms).
Larger window (203k).
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Higher SWE-bench (65.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Lower output list price ($0.72/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Lower TTFT (180 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Larger window (203k). |
| Screenshots / vision | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo | Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
