CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs Relace: Relace Apply 3

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs Relace: Relace Apply 3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Relace: Relace Apply 3 is more budget-friendly at $1.25/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Relace: Relace Apply 3 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Relace: Relace Apply 3 holds empirical advantage (3 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Relace: Relace Apply 3Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (0)Relace: Relace Apply 3 (3)
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
0 of 3 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Relace: Relace Apply 3
3 of 3 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price✓Context window
Zhipu
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (z-ai/glm-5v-turbo). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,475In: $1.2 · Out: $4/1M
relace
Leads 3 of 3
Relace: Relace Apply 3

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (relace/relace-apply-3). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.85 · Out: $1.25/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderRelace: Relace Apply 3 Wins

Relace: Relace Apply 3

$1.25 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (7)vsRelace: Relace Apply 3 (3)
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 7W (70%)Overall: Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboRelace: Relace Apply 3: 3W (30%)
← Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboRelace: Relace Apply 3 →
🏆Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Z.ai: GLM 5V TurbovsRelace: Relace Apply 3
Preference Elo
1,475vs—
Coding Elo
1,482vs—
SWE-bench
65.2%vs—
LiveBench
63.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
77.4%vs—
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 5WRelace: Relace Apply 3: 0W
🏆Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Z.ai: GLM 5V TurbovsRelace: Relace Apply 3
Output speed
112 tok/svs—
Time to first token
180 msvs—
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 2WRelace: Relace Apply 3: 0W
🏆Relace: Relace Apply 3 Leads(3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Z.ai: GLM 5V TurbovsRelace: Relace Apply 3
Output price
$4/1Mvs$1.25/1M+$2.75/1M
Input price
$1.2/1Mvs$0.85/1M+$0.35/1M
Context window
203kvs256k+53k
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 0WRelace: Relace Apply 3: 3W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboRelace: Relace Apply 3
Preference Elo
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo1,475
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
Coding Elo
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo1,482
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
LiveBench
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo63.8%
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
SWE-bench
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo65.2%
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
GPQA Diamond
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo77.4%
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
Time to first token
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo180 ms
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
Output speed
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo112 tok/s
Relace: Relace Apply 3—
Input priceRelace: Relace Apply 3 +$0.35/1M
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo$1.2/1M
Relace: Relace Apply 3$0.85/1M
Output priceRelace: Relace Apply 3 +$2.75/1M
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo$4/1M
Relace: Relace Apply 3$1.25/1M
Context windowRelace: Relace Apply 3 +53k
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo203k
Relace: Relace Apply 3256k
BenchmarkZ.ai: GLM 5V TurboRelace: Relace Apply 3Advantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,475
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,482
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
LiveBench
63.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
SWE-bench
65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
77.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
112 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$1.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.85/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$0.35/1M
Output price
$4/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1.25/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+$2.75/1M
Context window
203k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
256k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
+53k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 52% with Relace: Relace Apply 3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo$102.00 / mo
In: $42Out: $60
Relace: Relace Apply 3$48.50 / mo
In: $29.75Out: $18.75
Estimated Cost Delta

Relace: Relace Apply 3 is estimated to save $53.50/month ($642/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Relace: Relace Apply 3:Pick Relace: Relace Apply 3 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatRelace: Relace Apply 3

Lower output list price ($1.25/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGRelace: Relace Apply 3

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatRelace: Relace Apply 3Lower output list price ($1.25/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGRelace: Relace Apply 3Larger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionZ.ai: GLM 5V TurboZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-relace-apply-3/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Zhipu

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Elo 1,475
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)112 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$4/1M
relace

Relace: Relace Apply 3

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)256k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.85/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo or Relace: Relace Apply 3?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo or Relace: Relace Apply 3?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Relace: Relace Apply 3 output tokens are $1.25/1M versus $4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo or Relace: Relace Apply 3?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Relace: Relace Apply 3 accepts 256k tokens versus 203k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo and Relace: Relace Apply 3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo matchups →|All Relace: Relace Apply 3 matchups →
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs GLM-5.2 (previous glm)Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs GLM-5.3 (next glm)Yi-Lightning vs Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboDoubao Pro 1.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboMistral Large 3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo