Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)
This page compares GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) and WizardLM-2 8x22B (Microsoft AI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. GPT-4o mini wins on output price at $0.6/1M. GPT-4o mini has the larger context window (128k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Microsoft AI
WizardLM-2 8x22BAuto-discovered from OpenRouter (microsoft/wizardlm-2-8x22b). Preview until a second source matches.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
No shared data
No shared data
$0.02/1M cheaper
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
GPT-4o mini is estimated to save $16.75/month ($201/year).
Need SWE-bench on both sides.
Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Need TTFT on both sides.
Larger window (128k).
GPT-4o mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | insufficient data | Need SWE-bench on both sides. |
| High-volume chat | GPT-4o mini | Lower output list price ($0.6/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | GPT-4o mini | Larger window (128k). |
| Screenshots / vision | GPT-4o mini | GPT-4o mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/gpt-4o-mini-vs-wizardlm-2-8x22b/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card