CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5.6 Luna vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Seed 2.1 Turbo benchmark

This page compares GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) and Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Seed 2.1 Turbo is ahead by 6 points (1,472 vs 1,466; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Seed 2.1 Turbo resolves 63.2% versus 61.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Luna streams faster (188 tok/s) while GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper output token ($0.6/1M). GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Seed 2.1 Turbo is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Seed 2.1 Turbo leads preference Elo (1,472 vs 1,466). Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench coding. GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

Elo 1,466$0.6/1M out

ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.

Elo 1,472$2.5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

GPT-5.6 Luna (5)vsSeed 2.1 Turbo (5)
GPT-5.6 Luna: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupSeed 2.1 Turbo: 5W (50%)
← GPT-5.6 LunaSeed 2.1 Turbo →
Seed 2.1 Turbo (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,466vs1,472
Coding Elo
1,458vs1,480
SWE-bench
61.8%vs63.2%
LiveBench
64.2%vs64.8%
GPQA Diamond
75.4%vs76.8%
GPT-5.6 Luna: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 5W
GPT-5.6 Luna (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
188 tok/svs160 tok/s
Time to first token
88 msvs120 ms
GPT-5.6 Luna: 2WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 0W
GPT-5.6 Luna (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.6/1Mvs$2.5/1M
Input price
$0.1/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Context window
1.1Mvs262k
GPT-5.6 Luna: 3WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

Seed 2.1 Turbo

6 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Luna

28 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GPT-5.6 Luna

$1.90/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,466
EloHigh is better
1,472
Code Elo
High is better
1,458
Code EloHigh is better
1,480+2%
LiveBench
High is better
64.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.8%+1%
SWE-bench
High is better
61.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
63.2%+2%
GPQA
High is better
75.4%
GPQAHigh is better
76.8%+2%
TTFT
Low is better
+36%88 ms
TTFTLow is better
120 ms
Speed
High is better
+18%188 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
160 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+400%$0.1/1M
In $Low is better
$0.5/1M
Out $
Low is better
+317%$0.6/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.5/1M
Context
High is better
+301%1.1M
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 77% with GPT-5.6 Luna
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5.6 Luna$12.50 / mo
In: $3.50Out: $9.00
Seed 2.1 Turbo$55.00 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $37.50
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5.6 Luna is estimated to save $42.50/month ($510/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Luna:Pick GPT-5.6 Luna when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 Turbo

Higher SWE-bench (63.2%).

High-volume chatGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Luna

Lower TTFT (88 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Luna

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 Turbo

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Seed 2.1 Turbo).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 TurboHigher SWE-bench (63.2%).
High-volume chatGPT-5.6 LunaLower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 LunaLower TTFT (88 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 LunaLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 TurboBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Seed 2.1 Turbo).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 10, 2026

Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

Listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop. Preview-quality story, indexable because we have a full snapshot.

priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

Luna is the OpenAI fast/cheap 5.6 SKU after Jul 30. It is not Sol. Sort by price and TTFT, not Elo.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gpt-5-6-luna-vs-seed-2-1-turbo/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

Elo 1,466
LiveBench64.2%
SWE-bench61.8%
Speed188 tok/s
Output cost$0.6/1M
ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Elo 1,472
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench63.2%
Speed160 tok/s
Output cost$2.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5.6 Luna or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,472). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5.6 Luna or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench at 63.2% vs 61.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5.6 Luna output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $2.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Luna or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower time-to-first-token (88 ms vs 120 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1.1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5.6 Luna and Seed 2.1 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 10, 2026

    Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Luna’s 80% cut: $0.20/$1.20 for volume chat

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5.6 Luna matchups →|All Seed 2.1 Turbo matchups →
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 mini (previous gpt-mini)Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (previous seed)GPT-4.5 Orion vs Seed 2.1 TurboGPT-5.6 Terra vs Seed 2.1 TurboGPT-5 vs Seed 2.1 TurboGPT-5.6 Sol vs Seed 2.1 Turbo