CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5.6 Terra vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 benchmark

This page compares GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Terra is ahead by 33 points (1,548 vs 1,515; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 resolves 71.3% versus 70.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Terra streams faster (128 tok/s) while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the cheaper output token ($2.85/1M). GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

GPT-5.6 Terra vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5.6 Terra leads preference Elo (1,548 vs 1,515). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

Elo 1,548$6/1M out

Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,515$2.8499999999999996/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

GPT-5.6 Terra (6)vsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (4)
GPT-5.6 Terra: 6W (60%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 4W (40%)
← GPT-5.6 TerraMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 →
GPT-5.6 Terra (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,548vs1,515
Coding Elo
1,542vs1,520
SWE-bench
70.4%vs71.3%
LiveBench
69.1%vs67.2%
GPQA Diamond
82%vs87.6%
GPT-5.6 Terra: 3WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 2W
GPT-5.6 Terra (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
128 tok/svs72 tok/s
Time to first token
160 msvs270 ms
GPT-5.6 Terra: 2WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 0W
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$6/1Mvs$2.85/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.57/1M
Context window
1.1Mvs262k
GPT-5.6 Terra: 1WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Terra

33 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Terra

56 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

$3.15/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+2%1,548
EloHigh is better
1,515
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,542
Code EloHigh is better
1,520
LiveBench
High is better
+3%69.1%
LiveBenchHigh is better
67.2%
SWE-bench
High is better
70.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
71.3%+1%
GPQA
High is better
82%
GPQAHigh is better
87.6%+7%
TTFT
Low is better
+69%160 ms
TTFTLow is better
270 ms
Speed
High is better
+78%128 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
72 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$1/1M
In $Low is better
$0.57/1M+75%
Out $
Low is better
$6/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.85/1M+111%
Context
High is better
+301%1.1M
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 50% with MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5.6 Terra$125.00 / mo
In: $35.00Out: $90.00
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$62.70 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $42.75
Estimated Cost Delta

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is estimated to save $62.30/month ($748/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Higher SWE-bench (71.3%).

High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Lower output list price ($2.85/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Terra

Lower TTFT (160 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Higher SWE-bench (71.3%).
High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Lower output list price ($2.85/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 TerraLower TTFT (160 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 TerraLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 TerraBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Terra is OpenAI’s Sonnet-class invoice. Use it when Sol is too expensive and Luna is too small.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gpt-5-6-terra-vs-kimi-k2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

Elo 1,548
LiveBench69.1%
SWE-bench70.4%
Speed128 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Elo 1,515
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench71.3%
Speed72 tok/s
Output cost$2.85/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5.6 Terra or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5.6 Terra or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads SWE-bench at 71.3% vs 70.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 output tokens are $2.85/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Terra or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower time-to-first-token (160 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5.6 Terra and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5.6 Terra matchups →|All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 matchups →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K3 (next kimi)GPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Terra