CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen 3 Max

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen 3 Max benchmark

This page compares GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) and Qwen 3 Max (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Terra is ahead by 30 points (1,548 vs 1,518; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Terra resolves 70.4% versus 67.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Terra streams faster (128 tok/s) while Qwen 3 Max is the cheaper output token ($3.9/1M). GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen 3 Max is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5.6 Terra leads preference Elo (1,548 vs 1,518). GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench coding. Qwen 3 Max is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

Elo 1,548$6/1M out

Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.

Elo 1,518$3.9/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

GPT-5.6 Terra (6)vsQwen 3 Max (4)
GPT-5.6 Terra: 6W (60%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraQwen 3 Max: 4W (40%)
← GPT-5.6 TerraQwen 3 Max →
GPT-5.6 Terra (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,548vs1,518
Coding Elo
1,542vs1,526
SWE-bench
70.4%vs67.8%
LiveBench
69.1%vs69.4%
GPQA Diamond
82%vs83.1%
GPT-5.6 Terra: 3WQwen 3 Max: 2W
GPT-5.6 Terra (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
128 tok/svs80 tok/s
Time to first token
160 msvs280 ms
GPT-5.6 Terra: 2WQwen 3 Max: 0W
Qwen 3 Max (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$6/1Mvs$3.9/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.78/1M
Context window
1.1Mvs262k
GPT-5.6 Terra: 1WQwen 3 Max: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Terra 4/6
Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Terra

30 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Terra

48 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Qwen 3 Max

$2.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+2%1,548
EloHigh is better
1,518
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,542
Code EloHigh is better
1,526
LiveBench
High is better
69.1%
LiveBenchHigh is better
69.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+4%70.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
67.8%
GPQA
High is better
82%
GPQAHigh is better
83.1%+1%
TTFT
Low is better
+75%160 ms
TTFTLow is better
280 ms
Speed
High is better
+60%128 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
80 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$1/1M
In $Low is better
$0.78/1M+28%
Out $
Low is better
$6/1M
Out $Low is better
$3.9/1M+54%
Context
High is better
+301%1.1M
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 31% with Qwen 3 Max
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5.6 Terra$125.00 / mo
In: $35.00Out: $90.00
Qwen 3 Max$85.80 / mo
In: $27.30Out: $58.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen 3 Max is estimated to save $39.20/month ($470/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen 3 Max:Pick Qwen 3 Max when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).

High-volume chatQwen 3 Max

Lower output list price ($3.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Terra

Lower TTFT (160 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 TerraHigher SWE-bench (70.4%).
High-volume chatQwen 3 MaxLower output list price ($3.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 TerraLower TTFT (160 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 TerraLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 TerraBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Terra is OpenAI’s Sonnet-class invoice. Use it when Sol is too expensive and Luna is too small.

launchApr 18, 2026

Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

Closed flagship. Strong math. Compare to Sol and Opus on GPQA and SWE-bench, not on brand heat.

launchSep 20, 2025

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gpt-5-6-terra-vs-qwen-3-max/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

Elo 1,548
LiveBench69.1%
SWE-bench70.4%
Speed128 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Elo 1,518
LiveBench69.4%
SWE-bench67.8%
Speed80 tok/s
Output cost$3.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen 3 Max?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen 3 Max?
GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench at 70.4% vs 67.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen 3 Max output tokens are $3.9/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Terra or Qwen 3 Max?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the lower time-to-first-token (160 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen 3 Max Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • price · Jul 30, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

  • launch · Apr 18, 2026

    Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

  • launch · Sep 20, 2025

    Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5.6 Terra matchups →|All Qwen 3 Max matchups →
Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen QwQ 32B (previous qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen3.8 27B (next qwen)GPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5.6 Terra