CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Grok 4.6 vs OpenAI o1-mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Grok 4.6 vs OpenAI o1-mini benchmark

This page compares Grok 4.6 (xAI) and OpenAI o1-mini (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Grok 4.6 is ahead by 147 points (1,592 vs 1,445; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Grok 4.6 resolves 69.1% versus 56.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Grok 4.6 streams faster (118 tok/s) while OpenAI o1-mini is the cheaper output token ($4.4/1M). Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (500k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Grok 4.6 vs OpenAI o1-mini is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Grok 4.6 leads preference Elo (1,592 vs 1,445). Grok 4.6 leads SWE-bench coding. OpenAI o1-mini is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

xAI

Grok 4.6

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

Elo 1,592$6/1M out

OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

Elo 1,445$4.4/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Grok 4.6 (8)vsOpenAI o1-mini (2)
Grok 4.6: 8W (80%)Overall: Grok 4.6OpenAI o1-mini: 2W (20%)
← Grok 4.6OpenAI o1-mini →
Grok 4.6 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,592vs1,445
Coding Elo
1,568vs1,468
SWE-bench
69.1%vs56.4%
LiveBench
71.4%vs62%
GPQA Diamond
84.6%vs76.8%
Grok 4.6: 5WOpenAI o1-mini: 0W
Grok 4.6 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
118 tok/svs85 tok/s
Time to first token
195 msvs280 ms
Grok 4.6: 2WOpenAI o1-mini: 0W
OpenAI o1-mini (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$6/1Mvs$4.4/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$1.1/1M
Context window
500kvs128k
Grok 4.6: 1WOpenAI o1-mini: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGrok 4.6 5/6
Preference Elo

Grok 4.6

147 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Grok 4.6

33 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

OpenAI o1-mini

$1.60/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+10%1,592
EloHigh is better
1,445
Code Elo
High is better
+7%1,568
Code EloHigh is better
1,468
LiveBench
High is better
+15%71.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
62%
SWE-bench
High is better
+23%69.1%
SWE-benchHigh is better
56.4%
GPQA
High is better
+10%84.6%
GPQAHigh is better
76.8%
TTFT
Low is better
+44%195 ms
TTFTLow is better
280 ms
Speed
High is better
+39%118 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
85 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$2/1M
In $Low is better
$1.1/1M+82%
Out $
Low is better
$6/1M
Out $Low is better
$4.4/1M+36%
Context
High is better
+291%500k
ContextHigh is better
128k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 35% with OpenAI o1-mini
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Grok 4.6$160.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $90.00
OpenAI o1-mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.50Out: $66.00
Estimated Cost Delta

OpenAI o1-mini is estimated to save $55.50/month ($666/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Grok 4.6:Pick Grok 4.6 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    OpenAI o1-mini:Pick OpenAI o1-mini when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Grok 4.6:Pick Grok 4.6 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4.6

Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).

High-volume chatOpenAI o1-mini

Lower output list price ($4.4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGrok 4.6

Lower TTFT (195 ms).

Long-document RAGGrok 4.6

Larger window (500k).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGrok 4.6Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).
High-volume chatOpenAI o1-miniLower output list price ($4.4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGrok 4.6Lower TTFT (195 ms).
Long-document RAGGrok 4.6Larger window (500k).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6Grok 4.6 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

launchAug 12, 2026

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

xAI’s Aug 12 2026 refresh of Grok 4.5. 500k context. The Grok vs ChatGPT hub remaps here.

launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/grok-4-6-vs-o1-mini/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
xAI

Grok 4.6

Elo 1,592
LiveBench71.4%
SWE-bench69.1%
Speed118 tok/s
Output cost$6/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI o1-mini

Elo 1,445
LiveBench62%
SWE-bench56.4%
Speed85 tok/s
Output cost$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4.6 or OpenAI o1-mini?
Grok 4.6 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,592). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Grok 4.6 or OpenAI o1-mini?
Grok 4.6 leads SWE-bench at 69.1% vs 56.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
OpenAI o1-mini output tokens are $4.4/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Grok 4.6 or OpenAI o1-mini?
Grok 4.6 has the lower time-to-first-token (195 ms vs 280 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Grok 4.6 accepts 500k tokens versus 128k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Grok 4.6 and OpenAI o1-mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • launch · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Grok 4.6 matchups →|All OpenAI o1-mini matchups →
Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4 (previous grok)OpenAI o1-mini vs GPT-4o mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI o1-mini vs OpenAI: o3 Mini (next gpt-mini)GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6GPT-5 vs Grok 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra vs Grok 4.6