CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Grok 4 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Grok 4 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0 benchmark

This page compares Grok 4 (xAI) and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 (meituan) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. Meituan: LongCat 2.0 wins on output price at $1.2/1M. Meituan: LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Grok 4 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Meituan: LongCat 2.0 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

xAI

Grok 4

Previous xAI flagship.

Elo 1,488$15/1M out

meituan

Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (meituan/longcat-2.0). Preview until a second source matches.

$1.2/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Grok 4 (6)vsMeituan: LongCat 2.0 (3)
Grok 4: 6W (67%)Overall: Grok 4Meituan: LongCat 2.0: 3W (33%)
← Grok 4Meituan: LongCat 2.0 →
Grok 4 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,488vs—
Coding Elo
—vs—
SWE-bench
58.6%vs—
LiveBench
64.1%vs—
GPQA Diamond
79%vs—
Grok 4: 4WMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 0W
Grok 4 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
98 tok/svs—
Time to first token
230 msvs—
Grok 4: 2WMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 0W
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$1.2/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.3/1M
Context window
256kvs1M
Grok 4: 0WMeituan: LongCat 2.0: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGrok 4 4/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Meituan: LongCat 2.0

$13.80/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,488
EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
64.1%
LiveBenchHigh is better
—
SWE-bench
High is better
58.6%
SWE-benchHigh is better
—
GPQA
High is better
79%
GPQAHigh is better
—
TTFT
Low is better
230 ms
TTFTLow is better
—
Speed
High is better
98 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
—
In $
Low is better
$3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.3/1M+900%
Out $
Low is better
$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.2/1M+1150%
Context
High is better
256k
ContextHigh is better
1M+310%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 91% with Meituan: LongCat 2.0
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Grok 4$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
Meituan: LongCat 2.0$28.50 / mo
In: $10.50Out: $18.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 is estimated to save $301.50/month ($3,618/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Meituan: LongCat 2.0:Pick Meituan: LongCat 2.0 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Meituan: LongCat 2.0:Pick Meituan: LongCat 2.0 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatMeituan: LongCat 2.0

Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMeituan: LongCat 2.0

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4

Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatMeituan: LongCat 2.0Lower output list price ($1.2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMeituan: LongCat 2.0Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGrok 4Grok 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/grok-4-vs-longcat-2-0/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
xAI

Grok 4

Elo 1,488
LiveBench64.1%
SWE-bench58.6%
Speed98 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
meituan

Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$1.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4 or Meituan: LongCat 2.0?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Grok 4 or Meituan: LongCat 2.0?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 output tokens are $1.2/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Grok 4 or Meituan: LongCat 2.0?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Meituan: LongCat 2.0 accepts 1M tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Grok 4 and Meituan: LongCat 2.0 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Grok 4 matchups →|All Meituan: LongCat 2.0 matchups →
Grok 4 vs Grok 3 (previous grok)Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6 (next grok)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok 4Gemini 3 Flash vs Grok 4Yi-Lightning vs Grok 4Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Grok 4