Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
This page compares HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 (HiDream) and Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro (Recraft) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 1, 2026. Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
HiDream
HiDream-O1-Image-1.5HiDream high-definition visual generator optimized for photorealism and accurate complex lighting.
Recraft
Recraft V4.1 Utility ProSpecialized generative model for vector art, icon sets, illustrations, and commercial design assets with native brand color matching.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
No shared data
No shared data
No shared data
Need SWE-bench on both sides.
Need list prices.
Need TTFT on both sides.
Need context sizes.
Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | insufficient data | Need SWE-bench on both sides. |
| High-volume chat | insufficient data | Need list prices. |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | insufficient data | Need context sizes. |
| Screenshots / vision | insufficient data | Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined). |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/hidream-o1-image-1-5-vs-recraft-v4-1-pro/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card