Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct benchmark

Name: Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights holds empirical advantage (0 of 0 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsTop code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsTop logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsFastest stream rate

Ideogram

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights

Open-weight release of Ideogram 4.0, bringing world-class text rendering to self-hosted enterprise infrastructure.

Open WeightsImg Elo 1,218$60/1k imgs

Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

Ideogram 4.0 Lineage & Sibling Variants

2 models

Currently comparing Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights

Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)$100/1k

Top Rival Showdowns for Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights (5)vsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (0)

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights: 5W (100%)Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 0W (0%)

← Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct →

🏆Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights Leads(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsvsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Image Elo

1,218vs—

Prompt adherence

91%vs—

Text rendering

95.8%vs—

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights: 3WQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 0W

🏆Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights Leads(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsvsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Generation time

3.8svs—

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights: 1WQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 0W

🏆Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights Leads(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsvsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Price per 1k images

$60/1kvs—

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights: 1WQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Image Elo

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights1,218

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Generation time

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights3.8s

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Price per 1k images

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights$60/1k

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Prompt adherence

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights91%

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Text rendering

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights95.8%

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Benchmark	Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights	Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,218 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	3.8s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$60/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	95.8% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 100% with Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights$1,500.00 / mo

Rate: $60/1k

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.00 / mo

Rate: $0/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is estimated to save $1,500.00/month ($18,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionIdeogram 4.0 Open Weights

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights	Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/ideogram-4-open-weights-vs-qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Ideogram

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$60/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$60/1k

Alibaba

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)262k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.21/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$1.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights or Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights or Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights or Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights matchups →|All Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct matchups →

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality) (previous ideogram)

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Image Elo

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights1,218

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Generation time

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights3.8s

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Price per 1k images

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights$60/1k

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Prompt adherence

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights91%

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Text rendering

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights95.8%

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct—

Benchmark	Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights	Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,218 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	3.8s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$60/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	95.8% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionIdeogram 4.0 Open Weights

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights	Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights or Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights or Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights or Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Ideogram 4.0 Open Weights and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.