Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) vs OpenAI: o1 benchmark

Name: Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) vs OpenAI: o1 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) (thinkingmachines) and OpenAI: o1 (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) wins on output price at $2.03/1M. Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) has the larger context window (524k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

thinkingmachines

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (thinkingmachines/inkling:batch). Preview until a second source matches.

$2.025/1M out

OpenAI

OpenAI: o1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o1). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,512$60/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) (3)vsOpenAI: o1 (7)

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 3W (30%)Overall: OpenAI: o1OpenAI: o1: 7W (70%)

← Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)OpenAI: o1 →

OpenAI: o1 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

—vs1,512

Coding Elo

—vs1,485

SWE-bench

—vs48.9%

LiveBench

—vs65.4%

GPQA Diamond

—vs78%

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 0WOpenAI: o1: 5W

OpenAI: o1 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

—vs45 tok/s

Time to first token

—vs420 ms

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 0WOpenAI: o1: 2W

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$2.03/1Mvs$60/1M

Input price

$0.5/1Mvs$15/1M

Context window

524kvs200k

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 3WOpenAI: o1: 0W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageOpenAI: o1 4/6

Preference Elo

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

$57.98/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

—

EloHigh is better

1,512

Code Elo

High is better

—

Code EloHigh is better

1,485

LiveBench

High is better

—

LiveBenchHigh is better

65.4%

SWE-bench

High is better

—

SWE-benchHigh is better

48.9%

GPQA

High is better

—

GPQAHigh is better

78%

TTFT

Low is better

—

TTFTLow is better

420 ms

Speed

High is better

—

SpeedHigh is better

45 tok/s

In $

Low is better

+2900%$0.5/1M

In $Low is better

$15/1M

Out $

Low is better

+2863%$2.03/1M

Out $Low is better

$60/1M

Context

High is better

+162%524k

ContextHigh is better

200k

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 97% with Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)$47.88 / mo

In: $17.50Out: $30.38

OpenAI: o1$1,425.00 / mo

In: $525.00Out: $900.00

Estimated Cost Delta

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) is estimated to save $1,377.13/month ($16,526/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch):Pick Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Lower output list price ($2.03/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Larger window (524k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1

OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)	Lower output list price ($2.03/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)	Larger window (524k).
Screenshots / vision	OpenAI: o1	OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/inkling-batch-vs-o1/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

thinkingmachines

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Elo n/a

LiveBench—

SWE-bench—

Speed—

Output cost$2.03/1M

OpenAI

OpenAI: o1

Elo 1,512

LiveBench65.4%

SWE-bench48.9%

Speed45 tok/s

Output cost$60/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) or OpenAI: o1?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) or OpenAI: o1?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) output tokens are $2.03/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) or OpenAI: o1?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) accepts 524k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) and OpenAI: o1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) matchups →|All OpenAI: o1 matchups →

OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)GPT-5 vs OpenAI: o1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs OpenAI: o1 GPT-5.6 Terra vs OpenAI: o1 GPT-5 mini vs OpenAI: o1

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) vs OpenAI: o1 benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) (3)vsOpenAI: o1 (7)

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 3W (30%)Overall: OpenAI: o1OpenAI: o1: 7W (70%)

← Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)OpenAI: o1 →

OpenAI: o1 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

—vs1,512

Coding Elo

—vs1,485

SWE-bench

—vs48.9%

LiveBench

—vs65.4%

GPQA Diamond

—vs78%

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 0WOpenAI: o1: 5W

OpenAI: o1 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

—vs45 tok/s

Time to first token

—vs420 ms

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 0WOpenAI: o1: 2W

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$2.03/1Mvs$60/1M

Input price

$0.5/1Mvs$15/1M

Context window

524kvs200k

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch): 3WOpenAI: o1: 0W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Lower output list price ($2.03/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGThinking Machines: Inkling (batch)

Larger window (524k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1

OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)	Lower output list price ($2.03/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch)	Larger window (524k).
Screenshots / vision	OpenAI: o1	OpenAI: o1 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) or OpenAI: o1?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) or OpenAI: o1?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) output tokens are $2.03/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) or OpenAI: o1?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) accepts 524k tokens versus 200k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Thinking Machines: Inkling (batch) and OpenAI: o1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.