Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,425 vs 1,420), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is more budget-friendly at $0.72/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.
Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.
Speed, cost, and intelligence tradeoffs across the Moonshot lineup
Δ 5 Arena Elo pts
110 tok/s
$0.72 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+5) | ||
| Coding Elo | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+105) | ||
| LiveBench | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+6.8%) | ||
| SWE-bench | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+14.2%) | ||
| GPQA Diamond | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+2.5%) | ||
| Time to first token | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+30 ms) | ||
| Output speed | 95 tok/s | 110 tok/s | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+15 tok/s) |
| Input price | $0.2/1M | $0.18/1M | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+$0.02/1M) |
| Output price | $0.8/1M | $0.72/1M | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (+$0.08/1M) |
| Context window | Kimi Chat 1.5 (+1.9M) |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is estimated to save $1.90/month ($23/year).
Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
Lower output list price ($0.72/1M).
Lower TTFT (180 ms).
Larger window (2M).
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Higher SWE-bench (65.2%). |
| High-volume chat | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Lower output list price ($0.72/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Lower TTFT (180 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Kimi Chat 1.5 | Larger window (2M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/kimi-1-5-long-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
