CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs OpenAI: o1

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs OpenAI: o1 benchmark

This page compares MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (Moonshot) and OpenAI: o1 (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, OpenAI: o1 is ahead by 47 points (1,512 vs 1,465; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 resolves 65.8% versus 48.9% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 streams faster (85 tok/s) while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is the cheaper output token ($2.3/1M). OpenAI: o1 has the larger context window (200k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs OpenAI: o1 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. OpenAI: o1 leads preference Elo (1,512 vs 1,465). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads SWE-bench coding. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,465$2.3/1M out

OpenAI

OpenAI: o1

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o1). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,512$60/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (5)vsOpenAI: o1 (5)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupOpenAI: o1: 5W (50%)
← MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711OpenAI: o1 →
OpenAI: o1 (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,465vs1,512
Coding Elo
1,470vs1,485
SWE-bench
65.8%vs48.9%
LiveBench
62.8%vs65.4%
GPQA Diamond
76.5%vs78%
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 1WOpenAI: o1: 4W
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
85 tok/svs45 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs420 ms
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 2WOpenAI: o1: 0W
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$2.3/1Mvs$60/1M
Input price
$0.57/1Mvs$15/1M
Context window
131kvs200k
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711: 2WOpenAI: o1: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

OpenAI: o1

47 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

40 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

$57.70/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,465
EloHigh is better
1,512+3%
Code Elo
High is better
1,470
Code EloHigh is better
1,485+1%
LiveBench
High is better
62.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
65.4%+4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+35%65.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
48.9%
GPQA
High is better
76.5%
GPQAHigh is better
78%+2%
TTFT
Low is better
+75%240 ms
TTFTLow is better
420 ms
Speed
High is better
+89%85 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
45 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+2532%$0.57/1M
In $Low is better
$15/1M
Out $
Low is better
+2509%$2.3/1M
Out $Low is better
$60/1M
Context
High is better
131k
ContextHigh is better
200k+53%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 96% with MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711$54.45 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $34.50
OpenAI: o1$1,425.00 / mo
In: $525.00Out: $900.00
Estimated Cost Delta

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 is estimated to save $1,370.55/month ($16,447/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    OpenAI: o1:Pick OpenAI: o1 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Higher SWE-bench (65.8%).

High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Lower output list price ($2.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Lower TTFT (240 ms).

Long-document RAGOpenAI: o1

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (OpenAI: o1).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Higher SWE-bench (65.8%).
High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Lower output list price ($2.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Lower TTFT (240 ms).
Long-document RAGOpenAI: o1Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionOpenAI: o1Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (OpenAI: o1).
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/kimi-k2-vs-o1/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711

Elo 1,465
LiveBench62.8%
SWE-bench65.8%
Speed85 tok/s
Output cost$2.3/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI: o1

Elo 1,512
LiveBench65.4%
SWE-bench48.9%
Speed45 tok/s
Output cost$60/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 or OpenAI: o1?
OpenAI: o1 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,512). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 or OpenAI: o1?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 leads SWE-bench at 65.8% vs 48.9%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 output tokens are $2.3/1M versus $60/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 or OpenAI: o1?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 has the lower time-to-first-token (240 ms vs 420 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
OpenAI: o1 accepts 200k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 and OpenAI: o1 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 matchups →|All OpenAI: o1 matchups →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs Kimi Chat 1.5 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (next kimi)OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4o (previous gpt-flagship)OpenAI: o1 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (next gpt-flagship)Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: o1GPT-5.6 Terra vs OpenAI: o1