Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 1, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, OpenAI o1-mini delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,445 vs 1,370), while Llama 3.1 405B leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (58.4%), while Llama 3.1 405B is more budget-friendly at $3.5/1M per 1M output tokens, while OpenAI o1-mini provides faster response streaming (85 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
9 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost
Meta flagship open-weight 405B dense foundation model with 128k context window.
OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.
Δ 75 Arena Elo pts
85 tok/s
$3.5 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 405B | OpenAI o1-mini | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | +75 | ||
| Coding Elo | +83 | ||
| LiveBench | +0.8% | ||
| SWE-bench | +2% | ||
| GPQA Diamond | +1.6% | ||
| Time to first token | +80 ms | ||
| Output speed | 42 tok/s | 85 tok/s | +43 tok/s |
| Input price | $1.25/1M | $1.1/1M | +$0.15/1M |
| Output price | $3.5/1M | $4.4/1M | +$0.9/1M |
| Context window | — |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
Llama 3.1 405B is estimated to save $8.25/month ($99/year).
Higher SWE-bench (58.4%).
Lower output list price ($3.5/1M).
Lower TTFT (280 ms).
Larger window (128k).
OpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | Llama 3.1 405B | Higher SWE-bench (58.4%). |
| High-volume chat | Llama 3.1 405B | Lower output list price ($3.5/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | OpenAI o1-mini | Lower TTFT (280 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Llama 3.1 405B | Larger window (128k). |
| Screenshots / vision | OpenAI o1-mini | OpenAI o1-mini is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/llama-3-1-405b-vs-o1-mini/opengraph-image
Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry