Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Llama 3.3 70B vs Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 benchmark

Name: Llama 3.3 70B vs Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Llama 3.3 70B (Meta) and Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 (amazon) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B wins on output price at $0.32/1M. Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 has the larger context window (300k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Llama 3.3 70B (8)vsAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0 (1)

Llama 3.3 70B: 8W (89%)Overall: Llama 3.3 70BAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 1W (11%)

← Llama 3.3 70BAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0 →

Llama 3.3 70B (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,285vs—

Coding Elo

—vs—

SWE-bench

45.1%vs—

LiveBench

49.8%vs—

GPQA Diamond

65.7%vs—

Llama 3.3 70B: 4WAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 0W

Llama 3.3 70B (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

140 tok/svs—

Time to first token

160 msvs—

Llama 3.3 70B: 2WAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 0W

Llama 3.3 70B (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.32/1Mvs$3.2/1M

Input price

$0.1/1Mvs$0.8/1M

Context window

131kvs300k

Llama 3.3 70B: 2WAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 1W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageLlama 3.3 70B 5/6

Preference Elo

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

Token Price Efficiency

Llama 3.3 70B

$2.88/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,285

EloHigh is better

—

LiveBench

High is better

49.8%

LiveBenchHigh is better

—

SWE-bench

High is better

45.1%

SWE-benchHigh is better

—

GPQA

High is better

65.7%

GPQAHigh is better

—

TTFT

Low is better

160 ms

TTFTLow is better

—

Speed

High is better

140 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

—

In $

Low is better

+700%$0.10 / 1M

In $Low is better

$0.80 / 1M

Out $

Low is better

+900%$0.32 / 1M

Out $Low is better

$3.20 / 1M

Context

High is better

131k

ContextHigh is better

300k+129%

Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 89% with Llama 3.3 70B

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Llama 3.3 70B$8.30 / mo

In: $3.5Out: $4.8

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0$76.00 / mo

In: $28Out: $48

Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 3.3 70B is estimated to save $67.70/month ($812/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Llama 3.3 70B:Pick Llama 3.3 70B when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatLlama 3.3 70B

Lower output list price ($0.32/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Larger window (300k).

Screenshots / visionAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Llama 3.3 70B	Lower output list price ($0.32/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0	Larger window (300k).
Screenshots / vision	Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0	Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

launchDec 6, 2024

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/llama-3-3-70b-vs-nova-pro-v1/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Llama 3.3 70B

Elo 1,285

LiveBench49.8%

SWE-bench45.1%

Speed140 tok/s

Output cost$0.32/1M

amazon

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Elo n/a

LiveBench—

SWE-bench—

Speed—

Output cost$3.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 3.3 70B or Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Llama 3.3 70B or Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Llama 3.3 70B output tokens are $0.32/1M versus $3.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Llama 3.3 70B or Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 accepts 300k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?: Llama 3.3 70B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 3.3 70B and Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 3.3 70B matchups →|All Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 matchups →

Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 3.1 70B (previous llama)Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 4 Maverick (next llama)Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 3.3 70B Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3.3 70B

Llama 3.3 70B vs Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Llama 3.3 70B (8)vsAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0 (1)

Llama 3.3 70B: 8W (89%)Overall: Llama 3.3 70BAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 1W (11%)

← Llama 3.3 70BAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0 →

Llama 3.3 70B (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,285vs—

Coding Elo

—vs—

SWE-bench

45.1%vs—

LiveBench

49.8%vs—

GPQA Diamond

65.7%vs—

Llama 3.3 70B: 4WAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 0W

Llama 3.3 70B (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

140 tok/svs—

Time to first token

160 msvs—

Llama 3.3 70B: 2WAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 0W

Llama 3.3 70B (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.32/1Mvs$3.2/1M

Input price

$0.1/1Mvs$0.8/1M

Context window

131kvs300k

Llama 3.3 70B: 2WAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0: 1W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatLlama 3.3 70B

Lower output list price ($0.32/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Larger window (300k).

Screenshots / visionAmazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	Llama 3.3 70B	Lower output list price ($0.32/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0	Larger window (300k).
Screenshots / vision	Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0	Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 3.3 70B or Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Llama 3.3 70B or Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Llama 3.3 70B output tokens are $0.32/1M versus $3.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Llama 3.3 70B or Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 accepts 300k tokens versus 131k.

Can I self-host either model?

Llama 3.3 70B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 3.3 70B and Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

No shared data

No shared data

Llama 3.3 70B

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Llama 3.3 70B

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

No shared data

No shared data

Llama 3.3 70B

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Llama 3.3 70B

Amazon: Nova Pro 1.0

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons