CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Mistral: Saba vs Yi-Large
Independent ReportPairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
noindex (thin pair)
Mistral: Saba(Mistral)
vs
Yi-Large(01.AI)

Mistral: Saba vs Yi-Large benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Yi-Large is more budget-friendly at $0.3/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Mistral: Saba if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Yi-Large if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Mistral: Saba holds empirical advantage (1 of 2 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Yi-LargeTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Yi-LargeTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Yi-LargeLowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Yi-LargeFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

2 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Mistral: Saba (1)Yi-Large (1)
Mistral: Saba
1 of 2 Wins
✓Input price
Yi-Large
1 of 2 Wins
✓Output price
Mistral
Leads 1 of 2
Mistral: Saba

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (mistralai/mistral-saba). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.2 · Out: $0.6/1M
01.AI
Leads 1 of 2
Yi-Large

01.AI full-scale dense model for complex instruction following.

Elo 1,430In: $0.3 · Out: $0.3/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Mistral: Saba
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderYi-Large Wins

Yi-Large

$0.3 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Mistral: Saba (1)vsYi-Large (8)
Mistral: Saba: 1W (11%)Overall: Yi-LargeYi-Large: 8W (89%)
← Mistral: Saba1 tiesYi-Large →
🏆Yi-Large Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Mistral: SabavsYi-Large
Preference Elo
—vs1,430
Coding Elo
—vs1,410
SWE-bench
—vs53.8%
LiveBench
—vs60.5%
GPQA Diamond
—vs72.4%
Mistral: Saba: 0WYi-Large: 5W
🏆Yi-Large Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Mistral: SabavsYi-Large
Output speed
—vs90 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs220 ms
Mistral: Saba: 0WYi-Large: 2W
Tied (1-1)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Mistral: SabavsYi-Large
Output price
$0.6/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$0.3/1M
Input price
$0.2/1Mvs$0.3/1M+$0.1/1M
Context window
33kvs33k
Mistral: Saba: 1WYi-Large: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Mistral: SabaYi-Large
Preference Elo
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large1,430
Coding Elo
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large1,410
LiveBench
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large60.5%
SWE-bench
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large53.8%
GPQA Diamond
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large72.4%
Time to first token
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large220 ms
Output speed
Mistral: Saba—
Yi-Large90 tok/s
Input priceMistral: Saba +$0.1/1M
Mistral: Saba$0.2/1M
Yi-Large$0.3/1M
Output priceYi-Large +$0.3/1M
Mistral: Saba$0.6/1M
Yi-Large$0.3/1M
Context window
Mistral: Saba33k
Yi-Large33k
BenchmarkMistral: SabaYi-LargeAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo—
1,430
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
Coding Elo—
1,410
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
—
LiveBench—
60.5%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
SWE-bench—
53.8%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
—
GPQA Diamond—
72.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Time to first token—
220 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Output speed—
90 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Input price
$0.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.1/1M
Output price
$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.3/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.3/1M
Context window
33k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
33k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 6% with Yi-Large
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Mistral: Saba$16.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $9
Yi-Large$15.00 / mo
In: $10.5Out: $4.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Large is estimated to save $1.00/month ($12/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Yi-Large:Pick Yi-Large when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatYi-Large

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMistral: Saba

Larger window (33k).

Screenshots / visionYi-Large

Yi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatYi-LargeLower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMistral: SabaLarger window (33k).
Screenshots / visionYi-LargeYi-Large is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/mistral-saba-vs-yi-large/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Mistral

Mistral: Saba

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)33k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.2/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.6/1M
01.AI

Yi-Large

Elo 1,430
SWE-bench53.8%
Speed (tok/s)90 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Mistral: Saba or Yi-Large?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Mistral: Saba or Yi-Large?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Large output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $0.6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Mistral: Saba or Yi-Large?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Mistral: Saba accepts 33k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Mistral: Saba and Yi-Large Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Mistral: Saba matchups →|All Yi-Large matchups →
Yi-Large vs Yi-Lightning (next other)Mistral Large 3 vs Yi-LargeCodestral 25.01 vs Yi-LargeClaude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-LargeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Yi-LargeClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Yi-Large