CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Yi-Lightning

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Yi-Lightning benchmark

This page compares Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (Mistral) and Yi-Lightning (01.AI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. Yi-Lightning wins on output price at $0.14/1M. Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct has the larger context window (66k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs Yi-Lightning is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Yi-Lightning is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Mistral

Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (mistralai/mixtral-8x22b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

$6/1M out

01.AI

Yi-Lightning

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

Elo 1,475$0.14/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct (1)vsYi-Lightning (9)
Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: 1W (10%)Overall: Yi-LightningYi-Lightning: 9W (90%)
← Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B InstructYi-Lightning →
Yi-Lightning (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
—vs1,475
Coding Elo
—vs1,480
SWE-bench
—vs63.4%
LiveBench
—vs65%
GPQA Diamond
—vs78%
Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: 0WYi-Lightning: 5W
Yi-Lightning (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs130 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs150 ms
Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: 0WYi-Lightning: 2W
Yi-Lightning (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$6/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Input price
$2/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Context window
66kvs16k
Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: 1WYi-Lightning: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageYi-Lightning 5/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Yi-Lightning

$5.86/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
—
EloHigh is better
1,475
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,480
LiveBench
High is better
—
LiveBenchHigh is better
65%
SWE-bench
High is better
—
SWE-benchHigh is better
63.4%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
78%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
150 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
130 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$2/1M
In $Low is better
$0.14/1M+1329%
Out $
Low is better
$6/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.14/1M+4186%
Context
High is better
+300%66k
ContextHigh is better
16k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 96% with Yi-Lightning
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$160.00 / mo
In: $70.00Out: $90.00
Yi-Lightning$7.00 / mo
In: $4.90Out: $2.10
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Lightning is estimated to save $153.00/month ($1,836/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatYi-Lightning

Lower output list price ($0.14/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGMistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Larger window (66k).

Screenshots / visionYi-Lightning

Yi-Lightning is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatYi-LightningLower output list price ($0.14/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGMistral: Mixtral 8x22B InstructLarger window (66k).
Screenshots / visionYi-LightningYi-Lightning is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/mixtral-8x22b-instruct-vs-yi-lightning/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Mistral

Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$6/1M
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Elo 1,475
LiveBench65%
SWE-bench63.4%
Speed130 tok/s
Output cost$0.14/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct or Yi-Lightning?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct or Yi-Lightning?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Lightning output tokens are $0.14/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct or Yi-Lightning?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct accepts 66k tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and Yi-Lightning Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct matchups →|All Yi-Lightning matchups →
Yi-Lightning vs Yi-Large (previous other)Yi-Lightning vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo (next other)Mistral Large 3 vs Yi-LightningCodestral 25.01 vs Yi-LightningClaude Opus 4.5 vs Yi-LightningClaude Opus 4.6 vs Yi-Lightning