CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Text-to-Image LeaderboardArena

FLUX.2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, Midjourney

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Flagship frontier titan duel

Sonnet 5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4

East vs West coding favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen3.8 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 4 Scout

Latest open-weights clash

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5

Generational upgrade (1 step back)

Opus 5 vs Opus 4.5

Anthropic generational delta

🎨 FLUX.2 Max vs GPT Image 2

Text-to-Image frontier leader

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Display Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 3 Max

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 3 Max benchmark

This page compares Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (Alibaba) and Qwen 3 Max (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, Qwen 3 Max is ahead by 93 points (1,518 vs 1,425; lmarena (Aug 17, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Qwen 3 Max resolves 67.8% versus 65.2% (swebench (Aug 17, 2026)). Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins on output price at $1/1M. Qwen 3 Max has the larger context window (262k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 3 Max is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Qwen 3 Max leads preference Elo (1,518 vs 1,425). Qwen 3 Max leads SWE-bench coding. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,425$1/1M out

Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.

Elo 1,518$3.9/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (2)vsQwen 3 Max (8)
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 2W (20%)Overall: Qwen 3 MaxQwen 3 Max: 8W (80%)
← Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen 3 Max →
Qwen 3 Max (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,425vs1,518
Coding Elo
1,495vs1,526
SWE-bench
65.2%vs67.8%
LiveBench
64.8%vs69.4%
GPQA Diamond
—vs83.1%
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0WQwen 3 Max: 5W
Qwen 3 Max (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
—vs80 tok/s
Time to first token
—vs280 ms
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0WQwen 3 Max: 2W
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$1/1Mvs$3.9/1M
Input price
$0.66/1Mvs$0.78/1M
Context window
33kvs262k
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 2WQwen 3 Max: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageQwen 3 Max 5/6
Preference Elo

Qwen 3 Max

93 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Token Price Efficiency

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

$2.90/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,425
EloHigh is better
1,518+7%
Code Elo
High is better
1,495
Code EloHigh is better
1,526+2%
LiveBench
High is better
64.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
69.4%+7%
SWE-bench
High is better
65.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
67.8%+4%
GPQA
High is better
—
GPQAHigh is better
83.1%
TTFT
Low is better
—
TTFTLow is better
280 ms
Speed
High is better
—
SpeedHigh is better
80 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+18%$0.66 / 1M
In $Low is better
$0.78 / 1M
Out $
Low is better
+290%$1.00 / 1M
Out $Low is better
$3.90 / 1M
Context
High is better
33k
ContextHigh is better
262k+700%
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 56% with Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$38.10 / mo
In: $23.1Out: $15
Qwen 3 Max$85.80 / mo
In: $27.3Out: $58.5
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is estimated to save $47.70/month ($572/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen 3 Max:Pick Qwen 3 Max when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct:Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Qwen 3 Max:Pick Qwen 3 Max as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen 3 Max

Higher SWE-bench (67.8%).

High-volume chatQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Lower output list price ($1/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen 3 Max

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionQwen 3 Max

Qwen 3 Max is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsQwen 3 MaxHigher SWE-bench (67.8%).
High-volume chatQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLower output list price ($1/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen 3 MaxLarger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionQwen 3 MaxQwen 3 Max is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchApr 18, 2026

Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

Closed flagship. Strong math. Compare to Sol and Opus on GPQA and SWE-bench, not on brand heat.

launchSep 20, 2025

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct-vs-qwen-3-max/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Elo 1,425
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed—
Output cost$1/1M
Alibaba

Qwen 3 Max

Elo 1,518
LiveBench69.4%
SWE-bench67.8%
Speed80 tok/s
Output cost$3.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen 3 Max?
Qwen 3 Max has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,518). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen 3 Max?
Qwen 3 Max leads SWE-bench at 67.8% vs 65.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct output tokens are $1/1M versus $3.9/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen 3 Max?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen 3 Max accepts 262k tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen 3 Max Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Apr 18, 2026

    Qwen 3 Max: Alibaba’s flagship for math and multilingual code

  • launch · Sep 20, 2025

    Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct matchups →|All Qwen 3 Max matchups →
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen 3 MaxQwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3 235B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructMistral Large 3 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct