CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Explore
Compare
Decide
Track
Learn
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Upstage: Solar Pro 3
Independent ReportPairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
noindex (thin pair)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B(Alibaba)
vs
Upstage: Solar Pro 3(upstage)

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Upstage: Solar Pro 3 benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Upstage: Solar Pro 3 is more budget-friendly at $0.6/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose Upstage: Solar Pro 3 if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:Share:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn
Executive Verdict Summary

Upstage: Solar Pro 3 holds empirical advantage (2 of 2 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BTop code solve rate
ReasoningGPQA / Live
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BTop logical accuracy
Best Value$/1M Tok
Upstage: Solar Pro 3Lowest API billing cost
Speed / TokTok/Sec
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

2 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (0)Upstage: Solar Pro 3 (2)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
0 of 2 Wins
Competitive baseline across remaining benchmarks
Upstage: Solar Pro 3
2 of 2 Wins
✓Input price✓Output price
Alibaba
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

Elo 1,425In: $0.18 · Out: $0.72/1M
upstage
Leads 2 of 2
Upstage: Solar Pro 3

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (upstage/solar-pro-3). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.15 · Out: $0.6/1M
Top Rival Showdowns for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderUpstage: Solar Pro 3 Wins

Upstage: Solar Pro 3

$0.6 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (7)vsUpstage: Solar Pro 3 (2)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 7W (78%)Overall: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BUpstage: Solar Pro 3: 2W (22%)
← Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1 tiesUpstage: Solar Pro 3 →
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Leads(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BvsUpstage: Solar Pro 3
Preference Elo
1,425vs—
Coding Elo
1,495vs—
SWE-bench
65.2%vs—
LiveBench
64.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
74%vs—
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 5WUpstage: Solar Pro 3: 0W
🏆Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Leads(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BvsUpstage: Solar Pro 3
Output speed
110 tok/svs—
Time to first token
180 msvs—
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 2WUpstage: Solar Pro 3: 0W
🏆Upstage: Solar Pro 3 Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BvsUpstage: Solar Pro 3
Output price
$0.72/1Mvs$0.6/1M+$0.12/1M
Input price
$0.18/1Mvs$0.15/1M+$0.03/1M
Context window
131kvs131k
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: 0WUpstage: Solar Pro 3: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BUpstage: Solar Pro 3
Preference Elo(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,425
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
Coding Elo(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B1,495
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
LiveBench(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B64.8%
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
SWE-bench(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B65.2%
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
GPQA Diamond(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B74%
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
Time to first token(Lower is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B180 ms
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
Output speed(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B110 tok/s
Upstage: Solar Pro 3—
Input price(Lower is better)
Upstage: Solar Pro 3 +$0.03/1M
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.18/1M
Upstage: Solar Pro 3$0.15/1M
Output price(Lower is better)
Upstage: Solar Pro 3 +$0.12/1M
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$0.72/1M
Upstage: Solar Pro 3$0.6/1M
Context window(Higher is better)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B131k
Upstage: Solar Pro 3131k
BenchmarkQwen 2.5 Coder 32BUpstage: Solar Pro 3Difference / Delta
Preference Elo
1,425
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,495
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
LiveBench
64.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
SWE-bench
65.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
180 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
110 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.18/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Upstage: Solar Pro 3+$0.03/1M
Output price
$0.72/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
$0.6/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Upstage: Solar Pro 3+$0.12/1M
Context window
131k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
131k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
= Same

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 17% with Upstage: Solar Pro 3
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B$17.10 / mo
In: $6.3Out: $10.8
Upstage: Solar Pro 3$14.25 / mo
In: $5.25Out: $9
Estimated Cost Delta

Upstage: Solar Pro 3 is estimated to save $2.85/month ($34/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Upstage: Solar Pro 3:Pick Upstage: Solar Pro 3 when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatUpstage: Solar Pro 3

Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Larger window (131k).

Screenshots / visionUpstage: Solar Pro 3

Upstage: Solar Pro 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatUpstage: Solar Pro 3Lower output list price ($0.6/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGQwen 2.5 Coder 32BLarger window (131k).
Screenshots / visionUpstage: Solar Pro 3Upstage: Solar Pro 3 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/qwen-2-5-coder-32b-vs-solar-pro-3/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Alibaba

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Elo 1,425
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed (tok/s)110 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$0.18/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.72/1M
upstage

Upstage: Solar Pro 3

Elo n/a
SWE-bench—
Speed (tok/s)131k
Input / 1M Tokens$0.15/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$0.6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Upstage: Solar Pro 3?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Upstage: Solar Pro 3?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Upstage: Solar Pro 3 output tokens are $0.6/1M versus $0.72/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or Upstage: Solar Pro 3?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B accepts 131k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B and Upstage: Solar Pro 3 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B matchups →|All Upstage: Solar Pro 3 matchups →
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (previous qwen)Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen3 235B (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen 3 Max vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B