CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Qwen3 235B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Qwen3 235B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo benchmark

This page compares Qwen3 235B (Alibaba) and Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Seed 2.1 Turbo is ahead by 32 points (1,472 vs 1,440; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Seed 2.1 Turbo resolves 63.2% versus 59.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Seed 2.1 Turbo streams faster (160 tok/s) while Qwen3 235B is the cheaper output token ($1.82/1M). Seed 2.1 Turbo has the larger context window (262k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Qwen3 235B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Seed 2.1 Turbo leads preference Elo (1,472 vs 1,440). Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench coding. Qwen3 235B is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Alibaba

Qwen3 235B

Open-weight Qwen3 mixture-of-experts.

Elo 1,440$1.8199999999999998/1M out

ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.

Elo 1,472$2.5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Qwen3 235B (2)vsSeed 2.1 Turbo (7)
Qwen3 235B: 2W (22%)Overall: Seed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo: 7W (78%)
← Qwen3 235B1 tiesSeed 2.1 Turbo →
Seed 2.1 Turbo (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,440vs1,472
Coding Elo
—vs1,480
SWE-bench
59.4%vs63.2%
LiveBench
63.5%vs64.8%
GPQA Diamond
76.8%vs76.8%
Qwen3 235B: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 4W
Seed 2.1 Turbo (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
74 tok/svs160 tok/s
Time to first token
320 msvs120 ms
Qwen3 235B: 0WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 2W
Qwen3 235B (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$1.82/1Mvs$2.5/1M
Input price
$0.45/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Context window
131kvs262k
Qwen3 235B: 2WSeed 2.1 Turbo: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageSeed 2.1 Turbo 5/6
Preference Elo

Seed 2.1 Turbo

32 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Seed 2.1 Turbo

86 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Qwen3 235B

$0.68/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,440
EloHigh is better
1,472+2%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,480
LiveBench
High is better
63.5%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.8%+2%
SWE-bench
High is better
59.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
63.2%+6%
GPQA
High is better
76.8%
GPQAHigh is better
76.8%
TTFT
Low is better
320 ms
TTFTLow is better
120 ms+167%
Speed
High is better
74 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
160 tok/s+116%
In $
Low is better
+10%$0.45/1M
In $Low is better
$0.5/1M
Out $
Low is better
+37%$1.82/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.5/1M
Context
High is better
131k
ContextHigh is better
262k+100%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 21% with Qwen3 235B
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Qwen3 235B$43.22 / mo
In: $15.92Out: $27.30
Seed 2.1 Turbo$55.00 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $37.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen3 235B is estimated to save $11.78/month ($141/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Qwen3 235B:Pick Qwen3 235B when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Seed 2.1 Turbo:Pick Seed 2.1 Turbo when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 Turbo

Higher SWE-bench (63.2%).

High-volume chatQwen3 235B

Lower output list price ($1.82/1M).

Voice / low-latency UISeed 2.1 Turbo

Lower TTFT (120 ms).

Long-document RAGSeed 2.1 Turbo

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 Turbo

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsSeed 2.1 TurboHigher SWE-bench (63.2%).
High-volume chatQwen3 235BLower output list price ($1.82/1M).
Voice / low-latency UISeed 2.1 TurboLower TTFT (120 ms).
Long-document RAGSeed 2.1 TurboLarger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionSeed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 10, 2026

Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

Listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop. Preview-quality story, indexable because we have a full snapshot.

launchSep 20, 2025

Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Sep 2025 open-weight mixture-of-experts. Self-host path. Don’t confuse it with Qwen 3 Max.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/qwen-3-235b-vs-seed-2-1-turbo/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Alibaba

Qwen3 235B

Elo 1,440
LiveBench63.5%
SWE-bench59.4%
Speed74 tok/s
Output cost$1.82/1M
ByteDance

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Elo 1,472
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench63.2%
Speed160 tok/s
Output cost$2.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen3 235B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,472). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Qwen3 235B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo leads SWE-bench at 63.2% vs 59.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Qwen3 235B output tokens are $1.82/1M versus $2.5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Qwen3 235B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo has the lower time-to-first-token (120 ms vs 320 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts 262k tokens versus 131k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen3 235B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen3 235B and Seed 2.1 Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 10, 2026

    Seed 2.1 Turbo (Aug 10): ByteDance’s API drop on the public timeline

  • launch · Sep 20, 2025

    Qwen3 235B: the open MoE Qwen, not the Max SKU

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Qwen3 235B matchups →|All Seed 2.1 Turbo matchups →
Qwen3 235B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (previous qwen)Qwen3 235B vs Qwen QwQ 32B (next qwen)Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Doubao Pro 1.5 (previous seed)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Seed 2.1 TurboQwen 3 Max vs Seed 2.1 TurboQwen 2.5 Plus vs Qwen3 235B