Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Mancer: Weaver (alpha) benchmark

Name: Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Mancer: Weaver (alpha) AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro and Mancer: Weaver (alpha). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro holds empirical advantage (0 of 0 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProTop code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProTop logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)Lowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProFastest stream rate

Recraft

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Specialized generative model for vector art, icon sets, illustrations, and commercial design assets with native brand color matching.

Img Elo 1,218$210/1k imgs

mancer

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (mancer/weaver). Preview until a second source matches.

Top Rival Showdowns for Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)

Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro (5)vsMancer: Weaver (alpha) (0)

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 5W (100%)Mancer: Weaver (alpha): 0W (0%)

← Recraft V4.1 Utility ProMancer: Weaver (alpha) →

🏆Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro Leads(3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProvsMancer: Weaver (alpha)

Image Elo

1,218vs—

Prompt adherence

91%vs—

Text rendering

94%vs—

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 3WMancer: Weaver (alpha): 0W

🏆Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro Leads(1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProvsMancer: Weaver (alpha)

Generation time

4.6svs—

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 1WMancer: Weaver (alpha): 0W

🏆Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro Leads(1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Benchmark

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProvsMancer: Weaver (alpha)

Price per 1k images

$210/1kvs—

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: 1WMancer: Weaver (alpha): 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProMancer: Weaver (alpha)

Image Elo

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro1,218

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Generation time

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro4.6s

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Price per 1k images

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro$210/1k

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Prompt adherence

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro91%

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Text rendering

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro94%

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Benchmark	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro	Mancer: Weaver (alpha)	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,218 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	4.6s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$210/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	94% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 100% with Mancer: Weaver (alpha)

Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)

Quick Presets:

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro$5,250.00 / mo

Rate: $210/1k

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)$0.00 / mo

Rate: $0/1k

Estimated Cost Delta

Mancer: Weaver (alpha) is estimated to save $5,250.00/month ($63,000/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/recraft-v4-1-pro-vs-weaver/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Recraft

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)—

Input / 1M Tokens$210/1k

Output / 1M Tokens$210/1k

mancer

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)8k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.5/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.75/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Mancer: Weaver (alpha)?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Mancer: Weaver (alpha)?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Mancer: Weaver (alpha)?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro and Mancer: Weaver (alpha) Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro matchups →|All Mancer: Weaver (alpha) matchups →

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs Recraft V4.1 Utility (previous recraft)

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Recraft V4.1 Utility ProMancer: Weaver (alpha)

Image Elo

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro1,218

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Generation time

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro4.6s

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Price per 1k images

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro$210/1k

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Prompt adherence

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro91%

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Text rendering

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro94%

Mancer: Weaver (alpha)—

Benchmark	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro	Mancer: Weaver (alpha)	Advantage Delta
Image Elo	1,218 seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Generation time	4.6s seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Price per 1k images	$210/1k seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Prompt adherence	91% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—
Text rendering	94% seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026	—	—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro	Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Mancer: Weaver (alpha)?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Mancer: Weaver (alpha)?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro or Mancer: Weaver (alpha)?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro and Mancer: Weaver (alpha) Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.