CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. FLUX.1.1 [pro]
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1.1 [pro]

FLUX.1.1 [pro] is a Black Forest Labs closed-API catalog model. First-generation professional API model from Black Forest Labs, renowned for 6x faster generation than original FLUX.1 Pro. Numbers below are dated snapshots, not a guarantee on your traffic mix.

At a glance

FLUX.1.1 [pro] is a Black Forest Labs closed-API catalog model. First-generation professional API model from Black Forest Labs, renowned for 6x faster generation than original FLUX.1 Pro. Numbers below are dated snapshots, not a guarantee on your traffic mix.
Last updated Aug 1, 2026
All 100 vsSave Model

Compare FLUX.1.1 [pro] against

Capability Profile

FLUX.1.1 [pro] Benchmark Percentiles

Plotted against all active catalog models (50th percentile = catalog median).

FLUX.1.1 [pro]
Median (50)

Dimensional Scorecards

Visual Quality
12%
Prompt Adherence
19%
Typography
36%
Gen Speed
64%
Price Value
64%

Benchmark Specifications

Dated snapshot metrics aggregated from official evaluators and API providers.

Image Elo1,210
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Generation time3.2s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Price per 1k images$50/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Prompt adherence89%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Text rendering89.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Benchmark MetricReported ScoreObserved Source
Image Elo1,210seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Generation time3.2sseed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Price per 1k images$50/1kseed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Prompt adherence89%seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Text rendering89.5%seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Compare with every model

Search or pick any catalog row. Suggested matchups first, then the full list.

Dedicated vs hub →
FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs FLUX.1 [schnell] (previous flux)FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs FLUX.2 [flex] (next flux)FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 2 (High)FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 2 (Low / Fast)FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 1.5FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DALL-E 3
Showing 100 of 100 comparisons
FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Opus 5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic current default flagship. Official API $5/$25 per 1M tokens and a 1M context window (Anthropic, Jul 24 2026).

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Fable 5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Compare

Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Grok 4.6xAI
Compare

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Compare

Follow-on Opus release. Slightly behind 4.5 on official SWE-bench bash-only in the last published sweep; stronger long-horizon agent traces.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 3.6 ProGoogle
Compare

Current Google Pro-class multimodal model. Long context, strong coding, billed like the 3.x Pro tier.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic frontier coding and computer-use model. SWE-bench leader on the official mini-SWE-agent harness in the Feb 2026 refresh.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs OpenAI: o3 MiniOpenAI
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o3-mini). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-5OpenAI
Compare

OpenAI flagship reasoning model for 2025–26. Strong general preference Elo and multimodal coverage.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GLM-5.3Zhipu
Compare

Z.ai Aug 14 2026 post-train of the GLM-5.2 744B base. Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review (z.ai/blog/glm-5.3).

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 3 ProGoogle
Compare

Google frontier multimodal model with a multi-million-token context window.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-4.5 OrionOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI largest dense non-reasoning model with expansive world knowledge and reduced hallucinations.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
Compare

Open-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Compare

Google Aug 13 2026 workhorse. Official intro price $0.75/$3.75 per 1M through Dec 31 2026; 1,048,576-token context (Google blog).

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Kimi K3Moonshot
Compare

Moonshot AI frontier flagship reasoning and agent swarm model with 256k context and top-tier SWE-bench coding capability.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Compare

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen 3 MaxAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Moonshot
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs OpenAI: o1OpenAI
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o1). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Compare

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 3 FlashGoogle
Compare

Fast Google frontier-adjacent model. Near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus price.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen QwQ 32BAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba specialized open reasoning model competing with frontier closed reasoning models.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GLM-5.2Zhipu
Compare

Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingGoogle
Compare

Google experimental reasoning model that visualizes thoughts in real-time.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
Compare

DeepSeek Jul 31 2026 price-performance SKU. Public listings put it near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Opus 4Anthropic
Compare

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Grok 4xAI
Compare

Previous xAI flagship.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Compare

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Yi-Lightning01.AI
Compare

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboZhipu
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (z-ai/glm-5v-turbo). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
Compare

ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Doubao Pro 1.5ByteDance
Compare

ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 4 MaverickMeta
Compare

Meta natively multimodal open-weight flagship.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Moonshot
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Mistral Large 3Mistral
Compare

Mistral European flagship with strong function calling.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic
Compare

First Sonnet 4 generation. Bridge between 3.5/3.7 and Sonnet 5.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Ernie 4.5 TurboBaidu
Compare

Baidu current multimodal enterprise foundation model with broad Chinese knowledge.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen 2.5 PlusAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba balanced flagship API model with high-throughput general reasoning.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs OpenAI o1-miniOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen3 235BAlibaba
Compare

Open-weight Qwen3 mixture-of-experts.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Yi-Large01.AI
Compare

01.AI full-scale dense model for complex instruction following.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructAlibaba
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Kimi Chat 1.5Moonshot
Compare

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 4 ScoutMeta
Compare

Meta open-weight Llama 4 long-context sibling of Maverick. Common public API lists sit near $0.08–$0.30 / $0.30–$0.70 per 1M; we store a conservative hosted list until OpenRouter overwrites.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-5 miniOpenAI
Compare

Cost-efficient GPT-5 distill for high-volume agents.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Grok 3xAI
Compare

Previous xAI generation before Grok 4. Kept for grok 3 vs grok 4.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba open-weight 27B drop dated Aug 14 2026. Dense enough to self-host; not a frontier MoE.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 3.1 405BMeta
Compare

Meta flagship open-weight 405B dense foundation model with 128k context window.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek
Compare

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic
Compare

Hybrid-reasoning Sonnet from 2025. Kept for historical compare pages.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Doubao Lite 1.5ByteDance
Compare

ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DeepSeek R1DeepSeek
Compare

Open-weights reasoning model trained with large-scale RL.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
Compare

Previous Google long-context flagship.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Command ACohere
Compare

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-4oOpenAI
Compare

Previous OpenAI flagship. Still a common compare baseline on legacy pages.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Codestral 25.01Mistral
Compare

Mistral code-specialist model.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Compare

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Compare

Previous Google speed workhorse.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 3.3 70BMeta
Compare

Previous Meta 70B open-weight workhorse.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic
Compare

2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-4o miniOpenAI
Compare

Legacy small OpenAI model. Useful as a cheap baseline.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle
Compare

First million-token Gemini Pro. Baseline for 1.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.x Pro.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT-4 TurboOpenAI
Compare

GPT-4 Turbo 128k. Historical flagship for gpt-4 turbo vs gpt-4o / gpt-5.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude 3 OpusAnthropic
Compare

Original Claude 3 flagship. Kept so opus 3 vs later Opus and vs GPT-4o still resolve.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Llama 3.1 70BMeta
Compare

Llama 3.1 70B instruct. Predecessor to 3.3 70B and Llama 4.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropic
Compare

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 2 (High)OpenAI
Compare

OpenAI flagship diffusion-transformer image synthesis model with supreme prompt adherence, realistic textures, and complex text composition.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 2 (Low / Fast)OpenAI
Compare

Fast distilled tier of GPT Image 2 designed for high-throughput interactive creative workflows at 70% lower price.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 1.5OpenAI
Compare

Previous OpenAI image generation flagship. High fidelity with proven enterprise reliability.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs DALL-E 3OpenAI
Compare

Legacy OpenAI image model benchmark baseline. Retained for historical comparisons.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Reve 2.1Reve
Compare

State-of-the-art cinematic image synthesis foundation model known for photorealistic lighting and aesthetic composition.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Google
Compare

Google DeepMind frontier multimodal image generation flagship with Deep Research and complex multi-object spatial reasoning.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Google
Compare

Google high-speed multimodal generative model delivering top Elo performance at half the latency and cost of Pro.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Nano Banana 2 LiteGoogle
Compare

Sub-1.5 second ultra-low latency tier for real-time applications and mobile game asset pipelines.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs FLUX.2 [max]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Black Forest Labs maximum-capacity flow-matching model with photoreal anatomy and leading typography fidelity.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs FLUX.2 [flex]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Flexible step-distilled variant of FLUX.2 offering 99% of Max quality with 45% faster generation speeds.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs FLUX.1 [dev]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Open-weights non-commercial base model with 12B parameters, serving as the foundation for the open-source fine-tuning ecosystem.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs FLUX.1 [schnell]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Apache 2.0 4-step distilled open weights model optimized for local inference and instant preview generation.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)Ideogram
Compare

Industry-leading typography, graphic design, and in-image text layout model with precise kerning and complex banner generation.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsIdeogram
Compare

Open-weight release of Ideogram 4.0, bringing world-class text rendering to self-hosted enterprise infrastructure.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Recraft V4.1 Utility ProRecraft
Compare

Specialized generative model for vector art, icon sets, illustrations, and commercial design assets with native brand color matching.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Recraft V4.1 UtilityRecraft
Compare

High-speed utility tier of Recraft V4.1 tailored for rapid asset production at $0.035/image.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Krea 2 LargeKrea
Compare

High-resolution real-time generation model tuned for artistic composition and dynamic concept art.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Krea 2 Medium TurboKrea
Compare

Sub-2 second interactive generation engine delivering ultra-affordable $15/1k image generation.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Qwen Image 2.0 ProAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba multimodal image synthesis foundation model with strong bilingual Chinese/English typography and cultural asset fidelity.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Wan2.6 Text to ImageAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba high-efficiency open video/image unified transformer backbone.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Seedream 5.0 ProByteDance
Compare

ByteDance flagship image generation model with high photorealism and fine facial structure rendering.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Seedream 4.0ByteDance
Compare

High-value ByteDance image foundation model at $30/1k images.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Midjourney v7Midjourney
Compare

Midjourney v7 premier creative image generation model with unparalleled stylistic nuances, coherent hands/anatomy, and cinematic grading.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Midjourney v6.1Midjourney
Compare

Previous standard in aesthetic digital art generation, retained as a historical compare baseline.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs MAI-Image-2.5Microsoft AI
Compare

Microsoft AI proprietary foundation image model for Copilot Studio and enterprise creative workflows.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs MAI-Image-2.5-FlashMicrosoft AI
Compare

Cost-optimized Microsoft AI image model delivering sub-2 second responses at $20/1k images.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs HiDream-O1-Image-1.5HiDream
Compare

HiDream high-definition visual generator optimized for photorealism and accurate complex lighting.

FLUX.1.1 [pro] vs Luma UNI 1 MaxLuma Labs
Compare

Luma Labs universal 3D-aware image synthesis engine with spatial geometry consistency.

Frequently asked questions

Plain-English methodology and leaderboard answers

FLUX.1.1 [pro] is a Black Forest Labs closed-API model. First-generation professional API model from Black Forest Labs, renowned for 6x faster generation than original FLUX.1 Pro.

Elo is a crowd vote on which hidden answer people liked more — not a school test. What is Elo?