CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. GPT Image 1.5
OpenAI

GPT Image 1.5

GPT Image 1.5 is a OpenAI closed-API catalog model. Previous OpenAI image generation flagship. High fidelity with proven enterprise reliability. Numbers below are dated snapshots, not a guarantee on your traffic mix.

At a glance

GPT Image 1.5 is a OpenAI closed-API catalog model. Previous OpenAI image generation flagship. High fidelity with proven enterprise reliability. Numbers below are dated snapshots, not a guarantee on your traffic mix.
Last updated Aug 1, 2026
All 100 vsSave Model

Compare GPT Image 1.5 against

Capability Profile

GPT Image 1.5 Benchmark Percentiles

Plotted against all active catalog models (50th percentile = catalog median).

GPT Image 1.5
Median (50)

Dimensional Scorecards

Visual Quality
81%
Prompt Adherence
64%
Typography
47%
Gen Speed
57%
Price Value
16%
Standout Competencies

Ranks in the top tier (≥75th percentile) for Visual Quality.

Benchmark Specifications

Dated snapshot metrics aggregated from official evaluators and API providers.

Image Elo1,313
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Generation time3.5s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Price per 1k images$133/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Prompt adherence91%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Text rendering90.5%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Benchmark MetricReported ScoreObserved Source
Image Elo1,313seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Generation time3.5sseed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Price per 1k images$133/1kseed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Prompt adherence91%seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Text rendering90.5%seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026

Compare with every model

Search or pick any catalog row. Suggested matchups first, then the full list.

Dedicated vs hub →
GPT Image 1.5 vs DALL-E 3 (previous gpt-image)GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT Image 2 (High) (next gpt-image)GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT Image 2 (Low / Fast)GPT Image 1.5 vs Reve 2.1GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Showing 100 of 100 comparisons
GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Opus 5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic current default flagship. Official API $5/$25 per 1M tokens and a 1M context window (Anthropic, Jul 24 2026).

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Fable 5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Compare

Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Grok 4.6xAI
Compare

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
Compare

Follow-on Opus release. Slightly behind 4.5 on official SWE-bench bash-only in the last published sweep; stronger long-horizon agent traces.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 3.6 ProGoogle
Compare

Current Google Pro-class multimodal model. Long context, strong coding, billed like the 3.x Pro tier.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic frontier coding and computer-use model. SWE-bench leader on the official mini-SWE-agent harness in the Feb 2026 refresh.

GPT Image 1.5 vs OpenAI: o3 MiniOpenAI
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o3-mini). Preview until a second source matches.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-5OpenAI
Compare

OpenAI flagship reasoning model for 2025–26. Strong general preference Elo and multimodal coverage.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GLM-5.3Zhipu
Compare

Z.ai Aug 14 2026 post-train of the GLM-5.2 744B base. Coding-plan live; open weights promised after a two-week safety review (z.ai/blog/glm-5.3).

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic workhorse. Official $2/$10 per 1M tokens made permanent on Aug 10 2026.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 3 ProGoogle
Compare

Google frontier multimodal model with a multi-million-token context window.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-4.5 OrionOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI largest dense non-reasoning model with expansive world knowledge and reduced hallucinations.

GPT Image 1.5 vs DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
Compare

Open-weight-adjacent DeepSeek flagship. High reasoning density per dollar.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
Compare

Google Aug 13 2026 workhorse. Official intro price $0.75/$3.75 per 1M through Dec 31 2026; 1,048,576-token context (Google blog).

GPT Image 1.5 vs Kimi K3Moonshot
Compare

Moonshot AI frontier flagship reasoning and agent swarm model with 256k context and top-tier SWE-bench coding capability.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Compare

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen 3 MaxAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba flagship. Strong math and multilingual code.

GPT Image 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Moonshot
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

GPT Image 1.5 vs OpenAI: o1OpenAI
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o1). Preview until a second source matches.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Compare

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 3 FlashGoogle
Compare

Fast Google frontier-adjacent model. Near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus price.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen QwQ 32BAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba specialized open reasoning model competing with frontier closed reasoning models.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GLM-5.2Zhipu
Compare

Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingGoogle
Compare

Google experimental reasoning model that visualizes thoughts in real-time.

GPT Image 1.5 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
Compare

DeepSeek Jul 31 2026 price-performance SKU. Public listings put it near $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Opus 4Anthropic
Compare

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Grok 4xAI
Compare

Previous xAI flagship.

GPT Image 1.5 vs MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Compare

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Yi-Lightning01.AI
Compare

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboZhipu
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (z-ai/glm-5v-turbo). Preview until a second source matches.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
Compare

ByteDance Seed 2.1 Turbo, listed on public model timelines as an Aug 10 2026 API drop.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Doubao Pro 1.5ByteDance
Compare

ByteDance flagship enterprise model with ultra-low token cost and 128k context.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Llama 4 MaverickMeta
Compare

Meta natively multimodal open-weight flagship.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI 5.6 fast/cheap tier. Official API $0.20/$1.20 per 1M after the Jul 30 80% Luna cut.

GPT Image 1.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711Moonshot
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2). Preview until a second source matches.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Mistral Large 3Mistral
Compare

Mistral European flagship with strong function calling.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic
Compare

First Sonnet 4 generation. Bridge between 3.5/3.7 and Sonnet 5.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Ernie 4.5 TurboBaidu
Compare

Baidu current multimodal enterprise foundation model with broad Chinese knowledge.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen 2.5 PlusAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba balanced flagship API model with high-throughput general reasoning.

GPT Image 1.5 vs OpenAI o1-miniOpenAI
Compare

OpenAI high-speed, cost-effective reasoning model optimized for STEM, math, and code generation.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen3 235BAlibaba
Compare

Open-weight Qwen3 mixture-of-experts.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Compare

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

GPT Image 1.5 vs Yi-Large01.AI
Compare

01.AI full-scale dense model for complex instruction following.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba dedicated open-weight code generation model with near-frontier SWE-bench Verified coding capability.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructAlibaba
Compare

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Kimi Chat 1.5Moonshot
Compare

Moonshot ultra-long context model supporting up to 2 million tokens per request.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Llama 4 ScoutMeta
Compare

Meta open-weight Llama 4 long-context sibling of Maverick. Common public API lists sit near $0.08–$0.30 / $0.30–$0.70 per 1M; we store a conservative hosted list until OpenRouter overwrites.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-5 miniOpenAI
Compare

Cost-efficient GPT-5 distill for high-volume agents.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Grok 3xAI
Compare

Previous xAI generation before Grok 4. Kept for grok 3 vs grok 4.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba open-weight 27B drop dated Aug 14 2026. Dense enough to self-host; not a frontier MoE.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Llama 3.1 405BMeta
Compare

Meta flagship open-weight 405B dense foundation model with 128k context window.

GPT Image 1.5 vs DeepSeek Coder V2DeepSeek
Compare

DeepSeek open-weight Mixture-of-Experts coding model supporting 338 programming languages and 128k context.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic
Compare

Hybrid-reasoning Sonnet from 2025. Kept for historical compare pages.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Doubao Lite 1.5ByteDance
Compare

ByteDance high-speed lightweight model priced at sub-cent levels.

GPT Image 1.5 vs DeepSeek R1DeepSeek
Compare

Open-weights reasoning model trained with large-scale RL.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
Compare

Previous Google long-context flagship.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Command ACohere
Compare

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-4oOpenAI
Compare

Previous OpenAI flagship. Still a common compare baseline on legacy pages.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Codestral 25.01Mistral
Compare

Mistral code-specialist model.

GPT Image 1.5 vs DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Compare

Prior DeepSeek flagship. Baseline for v3 vs v4.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Compare

Previous Google speed workhorse.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Llama 3.3 70BMeta
Compare

Previous Meta 70B open-weight workhorse.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic
Compare

2024 workhorse. Still a high-intent compare against GPT-4o.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-4o miniOpenAI
Compare

Legacy small OpenAI model. Useful as a cheap baseline.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle
Compare

First million-token Gemini Pro. Baseline for 1.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.x Pro.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT-4 TurboOpenAI
Compare

GPT-4 Turbo 128k. Historical flagship for gpt-4 turbo vs gpt-4o / gpt-5.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude 3 OpusAnthropic
Compare

Original Claude 3 flagship. Kept so opus 3 vs later Opus and vs GPT-4o still resolve.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Llama 3.1 70BMeta
Compare

Llama 3.1 70B instruct. Predecessor to 3.3 70B and Llama 4.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropic
Compare

Previous cheap Claude. Haiku 4.5 is the current $1/$5 SKU.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT Image 2 (High)OpenAI
Compare

OpenAI flagship diffusion-transformer image synthesis model with supreme prompt adherence, realistic textures, and complex text composition.

GPT Image 1.5 vs GPT Image 2 (Low / Fast)OpenAI
Compare

Fast distilled tier of GPT Image 2 designed for high-throughput interactive creative workflows at 70% lower price.

GPT Image 1.5 vs DALL-E 3OpenAI
Compare

Legacy OpenAI image model benchmark baseline. Retained for historical comparisons.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Reve 2.1Reve
Compare

State-of-the-art cinematic image synthesis foundation model known for photorealistic lighting and aesthetic composition.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Google
Compare

Google DeepMind frontier multimodal image generation flagship with Deep Research and complex multi-object spatial reasoning.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Google
Compare

Google high-speed multimodal generative model delivering top Elo performance at half the latency and cost of Pro.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Nano Banana 2 LiteGoogle
Compare

Sub-1.5 second ultra-low latency tier for real-time applications and mobile game asset pipelines.

GPT Image 1.5 vs FLUX.2 [max]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Black Forest Labs maximum-capacity flow-matching model with photoreal anatomy and leading typography fidelity.

GPT Image 1.5 vs FLUX.2 [flex]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Flexible step-distilled variant of FLUX.2 offering 99% of Max quality with 45% faster generation speeds.

GPT Image 1.5 vs FLUX.1.1 [pro]Black Forest Labs
Compare

First-generation professional API model from Black Forest Labs, renowned for 6x faster generation than original FLUX.1 Pro.

GPT Image 1.5 vs FLUX.1 [dev]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Open-weights non-commercial base model with 12B parameters, serving as the foundation for the open-source fine-tuning ecosystem.

GPT Image 1.5 vs FLUX.1 [schnell]Black Forest Labs
Compare

Apache 2.0 4-step distilled open weights model optimized for local inference and instant preview generation.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)Ideogram
Compare

Industry-leading typography, graphic design, and in-image text layout model with precise kerning and complex banner generation.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Ideogram 4.0 Open WeightsIdeogram
Compare

Open-weight release of Ideogram 4.0, bringing world-class text rendering to self-hosted enterprise infrastructure.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Recraft V4.1 Utility ProRecraft
Compare

Specialized generative model for vector art, icon sets, illustrations, and commercial design assets with native brand color matching.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Recraft V4.1 UtilityRecraft
Compare

High-speed utility tier of Recraft V4.1 tailored for rapid asset production at $0.035/image.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Krea 2 LargeKrea
Compare

High-resolution real-time generation model tuned for artistic composition and dynamic concept art.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Krea 2 Medium TurboKrea
Compare

Sub-2 second interactive generation engine delivering ultra-affordable $15/1k image generation.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Qwen Image 2.0 ProAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba multimodal image synthesis foundation model with strong bilingual Chinese/English typography and cultural asset fidelity.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Wan2.6 Text to ImageAlibaba
Compare

Alibaba high-efficiency open video/image unified transformer backbone.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Seedream 5.0 ProByteDance
Compare

ByteDance flagship image generation model with high photorealism and fine facial structure rendering.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Seedream 4.0ByteDance
Compare

High-value ByteDance image foundation model at $30/1k images.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Midjourney v7Midjourney
Compare

Midjourney v7 premier creative image generation model with unparalleled stylistic nuances, coherent hands/anatomy, and cinematic grading.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Midjourney v6.1Midjourney
Compare

Previous standard in aesthetic digital art generation, retained as a historical compare baseline.

GPT Image 1.5 vs MAI-Image-2.5Microsoft AI
Compare

Microsoft AI proprietary foundation image model for Copilot Studio and enterprise creative workflows.

GPT Image 1.5 vs MAI-Image-2.5-FlashMicrosoft AI
Compare

Cost-optimized Microsoft AI image model delivering sub-2 second responses at $20/1k images.

GPT Image 1.5 vs HiDream-O1-Image-1.5HiDream
Compare

HiDream high-definition visual generator optimized for photorealism and accurate complex lighting.

GPT Image 1.5 vs Luma UNI 1 MaxLuma Labs
Compare

Luma Labs universal 3D-aware image synthesis engine with spatial geometry consistency.

Frequently asked questions

Plain-English methodology and leaderboard answers

GPT Image 1.5 is a OpenAI closed-API model. Previous OpenAI image generation flagship. High fidelity with proven enterprise reliability.

Elo is a crowd vote on which hidden answer people liked more — not a school test. What is Elo?