CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship
Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship
launchVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·Jun 20, 2026

Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

Opus 4.8 still bills $5/$25. We keep it so Opus 5 vs 4.8 is a real generation delta, not marketing.

Search intent: claude opus 4.8 vs opus 5

Evaluated Models:Claude Opus 4.8(Anthropic)Claude Opus 5(Anthropic)
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5 Benchmark Breakdown

Full Head-to-Head
Elo Quality1,598Claude Opus 4.8
SWE-bench78.4%Coding ability
Speed66 tok/sInference rate
Token Cost$25.00per 1M reply

50% Lower Token Cost Advantage

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $25.00/1M compared to Claude Opus 5 at $50.00/1M.

Preference EloGeneral quality
+26.0 Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.81,598
Claude Opus 51,624
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware engineering %
+0.8 Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.878.4%
Claude Opus 579.2%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science %
+0.9 Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.886.2%
Claude Opus 587.1%
ThroughputTokens / sec speed
+6.0 Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 4.866 tok/s
Claude Opus 572 tok/s
Output Priceper 1M reply tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 ($25.00 cheaper)
Claude Opus 4.8$25/1M
Claude Opus 5$50/1M
Benchmark MetricClaude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 5Advantage
Preference EloGeneral quality1,5981,624+26.0 Claude Opus 5
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware engineering %78.4%79.2%+0.8 Claude Opus 5
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science %86.2%87.1%+0.9 Claude Opus 5
ThroughputTokens / sec speed66 tok/s72 tok/s+6.0 Claude Opus 5
Output Priceper 1M reply tokens$25/1M$50/1MClaude Opus 4.8 ($25.00 cheaper)
Executive Key Takeaway
Opus 4.8 still bills $5/$25. We keep it so Opus 5 vs 4.8 is a real generation delta, not marketing.

Claude Opus 4.8 is the prior Opus generation still on a $5/$25 list. We did not delete it when Opus 5 shipped. Generation compares die when catalogs only keep the crown. If you are migrating a production prompt, open 4.8 vs 5 and look at SWE-bench and Elo together, then run your own golden set.

Why a “worse” row still belongs in the sitemap

Deprecated-feeling SKUs are how people search for upgrades. “opus 4.8 vs opus 5” is a real query. Thin catalogs 404 that intent. We keep 4.8 indexable while it still has three or more dated metrics.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Standardized telemetry recorded in the verified CompareLLM Leaderboards captures distinct architectural priorities between Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 5. While blind human pairwise preference testing reflects instruction compliance and reasoning depth, domain-specific suites such as SWE-bench Verified and GPQA Diamond highlight coding execution and advanced STEM reasoning. For the live pairwise breakdown with historical trendlines, reference the interactive scorecard above or visit the Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5 Showdown.

When to stop paying for 4.8

If 5 is cheaper or equal and leads SWE-bench on the same harness date, switch. If 4.8 still wins your private eval, stay — public tables leak.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Explore the live pairwise breakdown at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-claude-opus-5.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? View the showdown at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-claude-opus-5.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? claude opus 4.8 vs opus 5.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5 mini

Related news

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

  • launch · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s default flagship — how to read it on CompareLLM

Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix