CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick
Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick
launchVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·Apr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

Search intent: llama 4 scout vs haiku

Evaluated Models:Llama 4 Scout(Meta)Claude Haiku 4.5(Anthropic)
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard

Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Benchmark Breakdown

Full Head-to-Head
Elo Quality1,412Llama 4 Scout
SWE-bench52.4%Coding ability
Speed155 tok/sInference rate
Token Cost$0.30per 1M reply

94% Lower Token Cost Advantage

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.30/1M compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 at $5.00/1M.

Preference EloGeneral quality
+26.0 Claude Haiku 4.5
Llama 4 Scout1,412
Claude Haiku 4.51,438
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware engineering %
+5.8 Claude Haiku 4.5
Llama 4 Scout52.4%
Claude Haiku 4.558.2%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science %
+2.8 Claude Haiku 4.5
Llama 4 Scout71.2%
Claude Haiku 4.574%
ThroughputTokens / sec speed
+20.0 Claude Haiku 4.5
Llama 4 Scout155 tok/s
Claude Haiku 4.5175 tok/s
Output Priceper 1M reply tokens
Llama 4 Scout ($4.70 cheaper)
Llama 4 Scout$0.3/1M
Claude Haiku 4.5$5/1M
Benchmark MetricLlama 4 ScoutClaude Haiku 4.5Advantage
Preference EloGeneral quality1,4121,438+26.0 Claude Haiku 4.5
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware engineering %52.4%58.2%+5.8 Claude Haiku 4.5
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science %71.2%74%+2.8 Claude Haiku 4.5
ThroughputTokens / sec speed155 tok/s175 tok/s+20.0 Claude Haiku 4.5
Output Priceper 1M reply tokens$0.3/1M$5/1MLlama 4 Scout ($4.70 cheaper)
Executive Key Takeaway
Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

Llama 4 Scout is Meta’s long-context Llama 4 sibling. Public hosted lists sit far below Claude Haiku. The window is the headline (we store a 10M-token seed until OpenRouter overwrites). That does not make Scout the better chatbot. Open Scout vs Haiku 4.5 for the cheap-closed vs cheap-open question.

A 10M window is a RAG feature

If you never stuff more than 32k, you are paying for a feature you do not use. Best-llm-for-rag cares. Best-llm-for-chat may not.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Standardized telemetry recorded in the verified CompareLLM Leaderboards captures distinct architectural priorities between Llama 4 Scout and Claude Haiku 4.5. While blind human pairwise preference testing reflects instruction compliance and reasoning depth, domain-specific suites such as SWE-bench Verified and GPQA Diamond highlight coding execution and advanced STEM reasoning. For the live pairwise breakdown with historical trendlines, reference the interactive scorecard above or visit the Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Showdown.

Seed prices are conservative

Cloud menus disagree ($0.08/$0.30 vs $0.25/$0.70). Seed uses a conservative cheap hosted list. Ingest from OpenRouter is the source of truth after the first successful pull.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Explore the live pairwise breakdown at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-llama-4-scout.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? View the showdown at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-llama-4-scout.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? llama 4 scout vs haiku.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Benchmark MatchupLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.5
Benchmark MatchupLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark MatchupClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Oct 22, 2025

    Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix