CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board
MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board
launchVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·Feb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Search intent: minimax m2.5 swe-bench

Evaluated Models (1):
MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard

MiniMax M2.5 Performance & Efficiency Dashboard

Live benchmark scores, throughput speeds, and token pricing with dynamic peer comparison.

LMSYS Arena Elo1,478MiniMax M2.5
SWE-bench Verified75.8%Coding resolve %
Throughput Speed90 tok/sGeneration rate
Output Price / 1M$1.20List rate
Interactive Model Comparison:1 model selected
MiniMax M2.5Article
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
quality
MiniMax M2.5
1,478
Coding EloProgramming preference
quality
MiniMax M2.5
1,536
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
quality
MiniMax M2.5
75.8%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
quality
MiniMax M2.5
76.2%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
quality
MiniMax M2.5
64.4%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
speed
MiniMax M2.5
90 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
speed
MiniMax M2.5
250 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
price
MiniMax M2.5
$1.2/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
price
MiniMax M2.5
$0.3/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
capacity
MiniMax M2.5
205k
Benchmark / Metric
MiniMax M2.5MiniMax · Article Model
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
1,478
Coding EloProgramming preference
1,536
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
75.8%
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
76.2%
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
64.4%
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
90 tok/s
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
250 ms
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
$1.2/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
$0.3/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
205k
Executive Key Takeaway
Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

MiniMax M2.5 tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026 at a fraction of Opus price. That is why it still appears on best-coding-llm. Preference Elo is not its trophy. If you only read Elo, you will skip it and overpay. Read the harness date — Feb is not August.

Specialists break composite indexes

This is why CompareLLM refuses a single intelligence number. A coding specialist would be averaged away. We show the raw SWE-bench cell instead.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Empirical evaluations recorded across the CompareLLM Leaderboard highlight how parameter scaling and inference optimization impact production throughput and cost-per-token economics. Reference the interactive scorecard above for verified snapshots or inspect the dedicated minimax-m2-5 dossier.

Open-weight coding agents

If you need weights plus coding, shortlist M2.5, GLM, and DeepSeek Flash, then run your repo. Public SWE-bench is one harness.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Explore the live pairwise breakdown at /best/best-coding-llm.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? View the showdown at /best/best-coding-llm.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? minimax m2.5 swe-bench.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Benchmark MatchupMiniMax M2.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5
Benchmark MatchupMiniMax M2.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6
Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix