CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.8

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark

This page compares Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4.8 is ahead by 236 points (1,598 vs 1,362; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.8 resolves 78.4% versus 70.3% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Claude 3.7 Sonnet streams faster (85 tok/s) while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the cheaper output token ($15/1M). Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.8 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Opus 4.8 leads preference Elo (1,598 vs 1,362). Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench coding. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Hybrid-reasoning Sonnet from 2025. Kept for historical compare pages.

Elo 1,362$15/1M out

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.

Elo 1,598$25/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs GPT-5

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (4)vsClaude Opus 4.8 (6)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 4W (40%)Overall: Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8: 6W (60%)
← Claude 3.7 SonnetClaude Opus 4.8 →
Claude Opus 4.8 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,362vs1,598
Coding Elo
—vs1,604
SWE-bench
70.3%vs78.4%
LiveBench
58.4%vs73.6%
GPQA Diamond
78.5%vs86.2%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 0WClaude Opus 4.8: 5W
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
85 tok/svs66 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs330 ms
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 2WClaude Opus 4.8: 0W
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$25/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$5/1M
Context window
200kvs1M
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 2WClaude Opus 4.8: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Opus 4.8 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Opus 4.8

236 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

19 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

$10.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,362
EloHigh is better
1,598+17%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,604
LiveBench
High is better
58.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
73.6%+26%
SWE-bench
High is better
70.3%
SWE-benchHigh is better
78.4%+12%
GPQA
High is better
78.5%
GPQAHigh is better
86.2%+10%
TTFT
Low is better
+38%240 ms
TTFTLow is better
330 ms
Speed
High is better
+29%85 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
66 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+67%$3/1M
In $Low is better
$5/1M
Out $
Low is better
+67%$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$25/1M
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
1M+400%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 40% with Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
Claude Opus 4.8$550.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $375.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is estimated to save $220.00/month ($2,640/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4.8:Pick Claude Opus 4.8 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude 3.7 Sonnet:Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude 3.7 Sonnet:Pick Claude 3.7 Sonnet when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8

Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).

High-volume chatClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Lower output list price ($15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Lower TTFT (240 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.8

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.8

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4.8).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).
High-volume chatClaude 3.7 SonnetLower output list price ($15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude 3.7 SonnetLower TTFT (240 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.8Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.8Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4.8).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 20, 2026

Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

Opus 4.8 still bills $5/$25. We keep it so Opus 5 vs 4.8 is a real generation delta, not marketing.

newsFeb 25, 2025

Claude 3.7 Sonnet stays as a historical hybrid-reasoning baseline

2025 hybrid-reasoning Sonnet. Deprecated for buying, kept for old compare URLs and “what did 3.7 score?”

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-claude-opus-4-8/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Elo 1,362
LiveBench58.4%
SWE-bench70.3%
Speed85 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Elo 1,598
LiveBench73.6%
SWE-bench78.4%
Speed66 tok/s
Output cost$25/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Claude Opus 4.8?
Claude Opus 4.8 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,598). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Claude Opus 4.8?
Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench at 78.4% vs 70.3%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet output tokens are $15/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Claude Opus 4.8?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the lower time-to-first-token (240 ms vs 330 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Opus 4.8 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 20, 2026

    Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

  • news · Feb 25, 2025

    Claude 3.7 Sonnet stays as a historical hybrid-reasoning baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude 3.7 Sonnet matchups →|All Claude Opus 4.8 matchups →
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (previous sonnet)Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4 (next sonnet)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (previous opus)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5 (next opus)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8