CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol benchmark

This page compares Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Fable 5 is ahead by 8 points (1,616 vs 1,608; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Fable 5 resolves 80% versus 77.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Sol streams faster (84 tok/s) while GPT-5.6 Sol is the cheaper output token ($30/1M). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Fable 5 leads preference Elo (1,616 vs 1,608). Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench coding. GPT-5.6 Sol is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Elo 1,616$50/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).

Elo 1,608$30/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Fable 5 (5)vsGPT-5.6 Sol (5)
Claude Fable 5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupGPT-5.6 Sol: 5W (50%)
← Claude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Sol →
Claude Fable 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,616vs1,608
Coding Elo
1,622vs1,602
SWE-bench
80%vs77.6%
LiveBench
75.2%vs73.9%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs86.8%
Claude Fable 5: 5WGPT-5.6 Sol: 0W
GPT-5.6 Sol (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
58 tok/svs84 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs270 ms
Claude Fable 5: 0WGPT-5.6 Sol: 2W
GPT-5.6 Sol (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$50/1Mvs$30/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$5/1M
Context window
1Mvs1.1M
Claude Fable 5: 0WGPT-5.6 Sol: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

Claude Fable 5

8 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Sol

26 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GPT-5.6 Sol

$20.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,616
EloHigh is better
1,608
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,622
Code EloHigh is better
1,602
LiveBench
High is better
+2%75.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
73.9%
SWE-bench
High is better
+3%80%
SWE-benchHigh is better
77.6%
GPQA
High is better
+1%87.6%
GPQAHigh is better
86.8%
TTFT
Low is better
340 ms
TTFTLow is better
270 ms+26%
Speed
High is better
58 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
84 tok/s+45%
In $
Low is better
$10/1M
In $Low is better
$5/1M+100%
Out $
Low is better
$50/1M
Out $Low is better
$30/1M+67%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1.1M+5%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 43% with GPT-5.6 Sol
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350.00Out: $750.00
GPT-5.6 Sol$625.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $450.00
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5.6 Sol is estimated to save $475.00/month ($5,700/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5.6 Sol:Pick GPT-5.6 Sol when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5.6 Sol:Pick GPT-5.6 Sol when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatGPT-5.6 Sol

Lower output list price ($30/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Sol

Lower TTFT (270 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Sol

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatGPT-5.6 SolLower output list price ($30/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 SolLower TTFT (270 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 SolLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

compareJul 24, 2026

Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Not a frozen 2025 article. Today that is usually Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. Dated cells, not a brand fight.

compareJul 16, 2026

Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

Hub remaps to top Google vs top OpenAI Elo. Usually 3.6 Pro vs Sol. Window vs price is the plot.

launchJul 9, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Jul 9 2026 family; Jul 30 price update left Sol unchanged. This is the GPT side of Claude vs GPT.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-gpt-5-6-sol/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
LiveBench75.2%
SWE-bench80%
Speed58 tok/s
Output cost$50/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

Elo 1,608
LiveBench73.9%
SWE-bench77.6%
Speed84 tok/s
Output cost$30/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 77.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5.6 Sol output tokens are $30/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower time-to-first-token (270 ms vs 340 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1.1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

  • compare · Jul 16, 2026

    Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

  • launch · Jul 9, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Sol matchups →
GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5 (previous gpt-flagship)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 SolClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol