Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol benchmark

Name: Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Sol is ahead by 10 points (1,608 vs 1,598; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.8 resolves 78.4% versus 77.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5.6 Sol streams faster (84 tok/s) while Claude Opus 4.8 is the cheaper output token ($25/1M). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.

Elo 1,598$25/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).

Elo 1,608$30/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Opus 4.8 (3)vsGPT-5.6 Sol (6)

Claude Opus 4.8: 3W (33%)Overall: GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol: 6W (67%)

← Claude Opus 4.81 tiesGPT-5.6 Sol →

GPT-5.6 Sol (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,598vs1,608

Coding Elo

1,604vs1,602

SWE-bench

78.4%vs77.6%

LiveBench

73.6%vs73.9%

GPQA Diamond

86.2%vs86.8%

Claude Opus 4.8: 2WGPT-5.6 Sol: 3W

GPT-5.6 Sol (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

66 tok/svs84 tok/s

Time to first token

330 msvs270 ms

Claude Opus 4.8: 0WGPT-5.6 Sol: 2W

Tied (1/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$25/1Mvs$30/1M

Input price

$5/1Mvs$5/1M

Context window

1Mvs1.1M

Claude Opus 4.8: 1WGPT-5.6 Sol: 1W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Sol 4/6

Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Sol

10 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5.6 Sol

18 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Claude Opus 4.8

$5.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,598

EloHigh is better

1,608+1%

Code Elo

High is better

1,604

Code EloHigh is better

1,602

LiveBench

High is better

73.6%

LiveBenchHigh is better

73.9%

SWE-bench

High is better

+1%78.4%

SWE-benchHigh is better

77.6%

GPQA

High is better

86.2%

GPQAHigh is better

86.8%+1%

TTFT

Low is better

330 ms

TTFTLow is better

270 ms+22%

Speed

High is better

66 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

84 tok/s+27%

In $

Low is better

$5/1M

In $Low is better

$5/1M

Out $

Low is better

+20%$25/1M

Out $Low is better

$30/1M

Context

High is better

ContextHigh is better

1.1M+5%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 12% with Claude Opus 4.8

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Claude Opus 4.8$550.00 / mo

In: $175.00Out: $375.00

GPT-5.6 Sol$625.00 / mo

In: $175.00Out: $450.00

Estimated Cost Delta

Claude Opus 4.8 is estimated to save $75.00/month ($900/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Claude Opus 4.8:Pick Claude Opus 4.8 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
GPT-5.6 Sol:Pick GPT-5.6 Sol when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
3
GPT-5.6 Sol:Pick GPT-5.6 Sol for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8

Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).

High-volume chatClaude Opus 4.8

Lower output list price ($25/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Sol

Lower TTFT (270 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Sol

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Sol

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Claude Opus 4.8	Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).
High-volume chat	Claude Opus 4.8	Lower output list price ($25/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	GPT-5.6 Sol	Lower TTFT (270 ms).
Long-document RAG	GPT-5.6 Sol	Larger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / vision	GPT-5.6 Sol	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

compareJul 24, 2026

Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Not a frozen 2025 article. Today that is usually Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. Dated cells, not a brand fight.

compareJul 16, 2026

Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

Hub remaps to top Google vs top OpenAI Elo. Usually 3.6 Pro vs Sol. Window vs price is the plot.

launchJul 9, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Jul 9 2026 family; Jul 30 price update left Sol unchanged. This is the GPT side of Claude vs GPT.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-gpt-5-6-sol/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Elo 1,598

LiveBench73.6%

SWE-bench78.4%

Speed66 tok/s

Output cost$25/1M

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

Elo 1,608

LiveBench73.9%

SWE-bench77.6%

Speed84 tok/s

Output cost$30/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?: GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,608). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?: Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench at 78.4% vs 77.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Claude Opus 4.8 output tokens are $25/1M versus $30/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?: GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower time-to-first-token (270 ms vs 330 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1.1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Sol Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4.8 matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Sol matchups →

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (previous opus)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5 (next opus)GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5 (previous gpt-flagship)Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Opus 4.8 (3)vsGPT-5.6 Sol (6)

Claude Opus 4.8: 3W (33%)Overall: GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol: 6W (67%)

← Claude Opus 4.81 tiesGPT-5.6 Sol →

GPT-5.6 Sol (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,598vs1,608

Coding Elo

1,604vs1,602

SWE-bench

78.4%vs77.6%

LiveBench

73.6%vs73.9%

GPQA Diamond

86.2%vs86.8%

Claude Opus 4.8: 2WGPT-5.6 Sol: 3W

GPT-5.6 Sol (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

66 tok/svs84 tok/s

Time to first token

330 msvs270 ms

Claude Opus 4.8: 0WGPT-5.6 Sol: 2W

Tied (1/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$25/1Mvs$30/1M

Input price

$5/1Mvs$5/1M

Context window

1Mvs1.1M

Claude Opus 4.8: 1WGPT-5.6 Sol: 1W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8

Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).

High-volume chatClaude Opus 4.8

Lower output list price ($25/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5.6 Sol

Lower TTFT (270 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Sol

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Sol

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Claude Opus 4.8	Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).
High-volume chat	Claude Opus 4.8	Lower output list price ($25/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	GPT-5.6 Sol	Lower TTFT (270 ms).
Long-document RAG	GPT-5.6 Sol	Larger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / vision	GPT-5.6 Sol	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,608). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench at 78.4% vs 77.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Claude Opus 4.8 output tokens are $25/1M versus $30/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower time-to-first-token (270 ms vs 330 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1.1M tokens versus 1M.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Sol Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol

Claude Opus 4.8

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Claude Opus 4.8

GPT-5.6 Sol

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol

Claude Opus 4.8

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Claude Opus 4.8

GPT-5.6 Sol

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons