CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5 mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5 mini benchmark

This page compares Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5 mini (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Fable 5 is ahead by 206 points (1,616 vs 1,410; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Fable 5 resolves 80% versus 52.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). GPT-5 mini streams faster (155 tok/s) while GPT-5 mini is the cheaper output token ($2/1M). Claude Fable 5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5 mini is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Fable 5 leads preference Elo (1,616 vs 1,410). Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench coding. GPT-5 mini is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic top-tier long-horizon model. Official API $10/$50 per 1M tokens (Claude Platform pricing, Aug 2026).

Elo 1,616$50/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5 mini

Cost-efficient GPT-5 distill for high-volume agents.

Elo 1,410$2/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Fable 5 (6)vsGPT-5 mini (4)
Claude Fable 5: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Fable 5GPT-5 mini: 4W (40%)
← Claude Fable 5GPT-5 mini →
Claude Fable 5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,616vs1,410
Coding Elo
1,622vs1,395
SWE-bench
80%vs52.4%
LiveBench
75.2%vs61.2%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs72%
Claude Fable 5: 5WGPT-5 mini: 0W
GPT-5 mini (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
58 tok/svs155 tok/s
Time to first token
340 msvs140 ms
Claude Fable 5: 0WGPT-5 mini: 2W
GPT-5 mini (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$50/1Mvs$2/1M
Input price
$10/1Mvs$0.25/1M
Context window
1Mvs400k
Claude Fable 5: 1WGPT-5 mini: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Fable 5 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Fable 5

206 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5 mini

97 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GPT-5 mini

$48.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+15%1,616
EloHigh is better
1,410
Code Elo
High is better
+16%1,622
Code EloHigh is better
1,395
LiveBench
High is better
+23%75.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
61.2%
SWE-bench
High is better
+53%80%
SWE-benchHigh is better
52.4%
GPQA
High is better
+22%87.6%
GPQAHigh is better
72%
TTFT
Low is better
340 ms
TTFTLow is better
140 ms+143%
Speed
High is better
58 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
155 tok/s+167%
In $
Low is better
$10/1M
In $Low is better
$0.25/1M+3900%
Out $
Low is better
$50/1M
Out $Low is better
$2/1M+2400%
Context
High is better
+150%1M
ContextHigh is better
400k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 96% with GPT-5 mini
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Fable 5$1,100.00 / mo
In: $350.00Out: $750.00
GPT-5 mini$38.75 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $30.00
Estimated Cost Delta

GPT-5 mini is estimated to save $1,061.25/month ($12,735/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Fable 5:Pick Claude Fable 5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GPT-5 mini:Pick GPT-5 mini when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    GPT-5 mini:Pick GPT-5 mini when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5

Higher SWE-bench (80%).

High-volume chatGPT-5 mini

Lower output list price ($2/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5 mini

Lower TTFT (140 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Fable 5Higher SWE-bench (80%).
High-volume chatGPT-5 miniLower output list price ($2/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGPT-5 miniLower TTFT (140 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Fable 5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Fable 5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Fable 5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 15, 2026

Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

Fable 5 is not Sonnet with extra adjectives. It is the expensive long-horizon row. Read SWE-bench and output price together.

launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

High-volume agents that cannot pay Sol. Compare to Luna before you assume the new cheap SKU wins.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-fable-5-vs-gpt-5-mini/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5

Elo 1,616
LiveBench75.2%
SWE-bench80%
Speed58 tok/s
Output cost$50/1M
OpenAI

GPT-5 mini

Elo 1,410
LiveBench61.2%
SWE-bench52.4%
Speed155 tok/s
Output cost$2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5 mini?
Claude Fable 5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,616). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5 mini?
Claude Fable 5 leads SWE-bench at 80% vs 52.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GPT-5 mini output tokens are $2/1M versus $50/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5 mini?
GPT-5 mini has the lower time-to-first-token (140 ms vs 340 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Fable 5 accepts 1M tokens versus 400k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5 mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 15, 2026

    Claude Fable 5: the $10/$50 long-horizon Anthropic SKU

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 mini: the 2025 distill still useful as a cheap OpenAI baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Fable 5 matchups →|All GPT-5 mini matchups →
GPT-5 mini vs OpenAI: o3 Mini (previous gpt-mini)GPT-5 mini vs GPT-5.6 Luna (next gpt-mini)Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5