CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4 benchmark

This page compares Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4 is ahead by 52 points (1,490 vs 1,438; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4 resolves 72.5% versus 58.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Claude Haiku 4.5 streams faster (175 tok/s) while Claude Haiku 4.5 is the cheaper output token ($5/1M). Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window (200k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Opus 4 leads preference Elo (1,490 vs 1,438). Claude Opus 4 leads SWE-bench coding. Claude Haiku 4.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

Elo 1,438$5/1M out

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

Elo 1,490$75/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (4)vsClaude Opus 4 (5)
Claude Haiku 4.5: 4W (44%)Overall: Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4: 5W (56%)
← Claude Haiku 4.51 tiesClaude Opus 4 →
Claude Opus 4 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,438vs1,490
Coding Elo
1,446vs1,502
SWE-bench
58.2%vs72.5%
LiveBench
62.4%vs66.8%
GPQA Diamond
74%vs80.4%
Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WClaude Opus 4: 5W
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
175 tok/svs58 tok/s
Time to first token
95 msvs390 ms
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WClaude Opus 4: 0W
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$5/1Mvs$75/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$15/1M
Context window
200kvs200k
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WClaude Opus 4: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Opus 4 3/6
Preference Elo

Claude Opus 4

52 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Haiku 4.5

117 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Claude Haiku 4.5

$70.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,438
EloHigh is better
1,490+4%
Code Elo
High is better
1,446
Code EloHigh is better
1,502+4%
LiveBench
High is better
62.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
66.8%+7%
SWE-bench
High is better
58.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
72.5%+25%
GPQA
High is better
74%
GPQAHigh is better
80.4%+9%
TTFT
Low is better
+311%95 ms
TTFTLow is better
390 ms
Speed
High is better
+202%175 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
58 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+1400%$1/1M
In $Low is better
$15/1M
Out $
Low is better
+1400%$5/1M
Out $Low is better
$75/1M
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
200k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 93% with Claude Haiku 4.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Haiku 4.5$110.00 / mo
In: $35.00Out: $75.00
Claude Opus 4$1,650.00 / mo
In: $525.00Out: $1125.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Claude Haiku 4.5 is estimated to save $1,540.00/month ($18,480/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4:Pick Claude Opus 4 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4

Higher SWE-bench (72.5%).

High-volume chatClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower output list price ($5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Haiku 4.5

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4Higher SWE-bench (72.5%).
High-volume chatClaude Haiku 4.5Lower output list price ($5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5Lower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Haiku 4.5Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchOct 22, 2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Official Anthropic list $1/$5. This is the SKU behind “cheapest Claude alternative” that is still Claude.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-claude-opus-4/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Elo 1,438
LiveBench62.4%
SWE-bench58.2%
Speed175 tok/s
Output cost$5/1M
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Elo 1,490
LiveBench66.8%
SWE-bench72.5%
Speed58 tok/s
Output cost$75/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,490). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 leads SWE-bench at 72.5% vs 58.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Claude Haiku 4.5 output tokens are $5/1M versus $75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 390 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts 200k tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

  • launch · Oct 22, 2025

    Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Haiku 4.5 matchups →|All Claude Opus 4 matchups →
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku (previous haiku)Claude Opus 4 vs Claude 3 Opus (previous opus)Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 (next opus)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4