CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking benchmark

This page compares Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is ahead by 52 points (1,490 vs 1,438; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking resolves 66.8% versus 58.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Claude Haiku 4.5 streams faster (175 tok/s) while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the cheaper output token ($0.4/1M). Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads preference Elo (1,490 vs 1,438). Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

Elo 1,438$5/1M out

Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Google experimental reasoning model that visualizes thoughts in real-time.

Elo 1,490$0.4/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (2)vsGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (8)
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2W (20%)Overall: Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: 8W (80%)
← Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking →
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,438vs1,490
Coding Elo
1,446vs1,515
SWE-bench
58.2%vs66.8%
LiveBench
62.4%vs67%
GPQA Diamond
74%vs81%
Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: 5W
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
175 tok/svs115 tok/s
Time to first token
95 msvs220 ms
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: 0W
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$5/1Mvs$0.4/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.1/1M
Context window
200kvs1M
Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking 5/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

52 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Haiku 4.5

60 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

$4.60/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,438
EloHigh is better
1,490+4%
Code Elo
High is better
1,446
Code EloHigh is better
1,515+5%
LiveBench
High is better
62.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
67%+7%
SWE-bench
High is better
58.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
66.8%+15%
GPQA
High is better
74%
GPQAHigh is better
81%+9%
TTFT
Low is better
+132%95 ms
TTFTLow is better
220 ms
Speed
High is better
+52%175 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
115 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$1/1M
In $Low is better
$0.1/1M+900%
Out $
Low is better
$5/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.4/1M+1150%
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
1M+424%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 91% with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Haiku 4.5$110.00 / mo
In: $35.00Out: $75.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking$9.50 / mo
In: $3.50Out: $6.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is estimated to save $100.50/month ($1,206/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking:Pick Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking:Pick Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Higher SWE-bench (66.8%).

High-volume chatGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Lower output list price ($0.4/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingHigher SWE-bench (66.8%).
High-volume chatGemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingLower output list price ($0.4/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5Lower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchOct 22, 2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Official Anthropic list $1/$5. This is the SKU behind “cheapest Claude alternative” that is still Claude.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-gemini-2-flash-thinking/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Elo 1,438
LiveBench62.4%
SWE-bench58.2%
Speed175 tok/s
Output cost$5/1M
Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Elo 1,490
LiveBench67%
SWE-bench66.8%
Speed115 tok/s
Output cost$0.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,490). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads SWE-bench at 66.8% vs 58.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking output tokens are $0.4/1M versus $5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 220 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

  • launch · Oct 22, 2025

    Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Haiku 4.5 matchups →|All Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking matchups →
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku (previous haiku)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 2.5 Flash (next gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingGemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingGemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking