Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra benchmark

Name: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Terra is ahead by 110 points (1,548 vs 1,438; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Terra resolves 70.4% versus 58.2% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Claude Haiku 4.5 streams faster (175 tok/s) while Claude Haiku 4.5 is the cheaper output token ($5/1M). GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

Elo 1,438$5/1M out

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI 5.6 mid tier. Official API $2/$12 per 1M after the Jul 30 2026 price cut.

Elo 1,548$6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (3)vsGPT-5.6 Terra (6)

Claude Haiku 4.5: 3W (33%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra: 6W (67%)

← Claude Haiku 4.51 tiesGPT-5.6 Terra →

GPT-5.6 Terra (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,438vs1,548

Coding Elo

1,446vs1,542

SWE-bench

58.2%vs70.4%

LiveBench

62.4%vs69.1%

GPQA Diamond

74%vs82%

Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 5W

Claude Haiku 4.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

175 tok/svs128 tok/s

Time to first token

95 msvs160 ms

Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WGPT-5.6 Terra: 0W

Tied (1/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$5/1Mvs$6/1M

Input price

$1/1Mvs$1/1M

Context window

200kvs1.1M

Claude Haiku 4.5: 1WGPT-5.6 Terra: 1W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Terra 4/6

Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Terra

110 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Claude Haiku 4.5

47 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Claude Haiku 4.5

$1.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,438

EloHigh is better

1,548+8%

Code Elo

High is better

1,446

Code EloHigh is better

1,542+7%

LiveBench

High is better

62.4%

LiveBenchHigh is better

69.1%+11%

SWE-bench

High is better

58.2%

SWE-benchHigh is better

70.4%+21%

GPQA

High is better

74%

GPQAHigh is better

82%+11%

TTFT

Low is better

+68%95 ms

TTFTLow is better

160 ms

Speed

High is better

+37%175 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

128 tok/s

In $

Low is better

$1/1M

In $Low is better

$1/1M

Out $

Low is better

+20%$5/1M

Out $Low is better

$6/1M

Context

High is better

200k

ContextHigh is better

1.1M+425%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 12% with Claude Haiku 4.5

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Claude Haiku 4.5$110.00 / mo

In: $35.00Out: $75.00

GPT-5.6 Terra$125.00 / mo

In: $35.00Out: $90.00

Estimated Cost Delta

Claude Haiku 4.5 is estimated to save $15.00/month ($180/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
GPT-5.6 Terra:Pick GPT-5.6 Terra when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).

High-volume chatClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower output list price ($5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	GPT-5.6 Terra	Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).
High-volume chat	Claude Haiku 4.5	Lower output list price ($5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Claude Haiku 4.5	Lower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAG	GPT-5.6 Terra	Larger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / vision	GPT-5.6 Terra	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

priceJul 30, 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Terra is OpenAI’s Sonnet-class invoice. Use it when Sol is too expensive and Luna is too small.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchOct 22, 2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Official Anthropic list $1/$5. This is the SKU behind “cheapest Claude alternative” that is still Claude.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-gpt-5-6-terra/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Elo 1,438

LiveBench62.4%

SWE-bench58.2%

Speed175 tok/s

Output cost$5/1M

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Terra

Elo 1,548

LiveBench69.1%

SWE-bench70.4%

Speed128 tok/s

Output cost$6/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?: GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?: GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench at 70.4% vs 58.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Claude Haiku 4.5 output tokens are $5/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?: Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 160 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Haiku 4.5 matchups →|All GPT-5.6 Terra matchups →

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku (previous haiku)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-4.5 Orion vs GPT-5.6 Terra Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (3)vsGPT-5.6 Terra (6)

Claude Haiku 4.5: 3W (33%)Overall: GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.6 Terra: 6W (67%)

← Claude Haiku 4.51 tiesGPT-5.6 Terra →

GPT-5.6 Terra (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,438vs1,548

Coding Elo

1,446vs1,542

SWE-bench

58.2%vs70.4%

LiveBench

62.4%vs69.1%

GPQA Diamond

74%vs82%

Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WGPT-5.6 Terra: 5W

Claude Haiku 4.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

175 tok/svs128 tok/s

Time to first token

95 msvs160 ms

Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WGPT-5.6 Terra: 0W

Tied (1/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$5/1Mvs$6/1M

Input price

$1/1Mvs$1/1M

Context window

200kvs1.1M

Claude Haiku 4.5: 1WGPT-5.6 Terra: 1W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).

High-volume chatClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower output list price ($5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Terra

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Terra

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	GPT-5.6 Terra	Higher SWE-bench (70.4%).
High-volume chat	Claude Haiku 4.5	Lower output list price ($5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Claude Haiku 4.5	Lower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAG	GPT-5.6 Terra	Larger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / vision	GPT-5.6 Terra	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5.6 Terra).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,548). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra leads SWE-bench at 70.4% vs 58.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Claude Haiku 4.5 output tokens are $5/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 160 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1.1M tokens versus 200k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

GPT-5.6 Terra

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Claude Haiku 4.5

GPT-5.6 Terra

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

GPT-5.6 Terra

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

GPT-5.6 Terra after the Jul 30 cut: $2/$12 mid-tier

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Claude Haiku 4.5

GPT-5.6 Terra

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons