CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4 vs AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude Opus 4 vs AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think is more budget-friendly at $0.5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Choose Claude Opus 4 if your priority is peak reasoning, complex code generation, and top preference Elo. Choose AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think if you are optimizing for low latency, high throughput, and cost-efficient API deployment.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4

First Claude 4 Opus generation. Baseline for opus 4 vs opus 5.

Elo 1,490$75/1M out
allenai
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (allenai/olmo-3-32b-think). Preview until a second source matches.

$0.5/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Opus 4
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think

$0.5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Opus 4 5/6
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Opus 4 (8)vsAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think (2)
Claude Opus 4: 8W (80%)Overall: Claude Opus 4AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think: 2W (20%)
← Claude Opus 4AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think →
Claude Opus 4 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,490vs—
Coding Elo
1,502vs—
SWE-bench
72.5%vs—
LiveBench
66.8%vs—
GPQA Diamond
80.4%vs—
Claude Opus 4: 5WAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think: 0W
Claude Opus 4 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
58 tok/svs—
Time to first token
390 msvs—
Claude Opus 4: 2WAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think: 0W
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$75/1Mvs$0.5/1M
Input price
$15/1Mvs$0.15/1M
Context window
200kvs66k
Claude Opus 4: 1WAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo
Claude Opus 41,490
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
Coding Elo
Claude Opus 41,502
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
LiveBench
Claude Opus 466.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
SWE-bench
Claude Opus 472.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
GPQA Diamond
Claude Opus 480.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
Time to first token
Claude Opus 4390 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
Output speed
Claude Opus 458 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think—
Input priceAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think (+$14.85/1M)
Claude Opus 4$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think$0.15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output priceAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think (+$74.5/1M)
Claude Opus 4$75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context windowClaude Opus 4 (+134k)
Claude Opus 4200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think66k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B ThinkAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,490
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
Coding Elo
1,502
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
——
LiveBench
66.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
SWE-bench
72.5%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
——
GPQA Diamond
80.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
390 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
58 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.15/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think (+$14.85/1M)
Output price
$75/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.5/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think (+$74.5/1M)
Context window
200k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
66k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Claude Opus 4 (+134k)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 99% with AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4$1,650.00 / mo
In: $525Out: $1,125
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think$12.75 / mo
In: $5.25Out: $7.5
Estimated Cost Delta

AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think is estimated to save $1,637.25/month ($19,647/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think:Pick AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think

Lower output list price ($0.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4

Larger window (200k).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatAllenAI: Olmo 3 32B ThinkLower output list price ($0.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4Larger window (200k).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4Claude Opus 4 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-vs-olmo-3-32b-think/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Elo 1,490
LiveBench66.8%
SWE-bench72.5%
Speed58 tok/s
Output cost$75/1M
allenai

AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$0.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4 or AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4 or AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think output tokens are $0.5/1M versus $75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4 or AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 4 accepts 200k tokens versus 66k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4 and AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4 matchups →|All AllenAI: Olmo 3 32B Think matchups →
Claude Opus 4 vs Claude 3 Opus (previous opus)Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 (next opus)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4