CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

This page compares Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is ahead by 46 points (1,524 vs 1,478; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MiniMax M2.5 resolves 75.8% versus 70.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). MiniMax M2.5 streams faster (90 tok/s) while MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.9/1M). Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads preference Elo (1,524 vs 1,478). MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Workhorse Anthropic model: most of Opus coding quality at a mid-tier price.

Elo 1,524$15/1M out

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$0.8999999999999999/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude 3.7 Sonnetvs GPT-5

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (5)vsMiniMax M2.5 (5)
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupMiniMax M2.5: 5W (50%)
← Claude Sonnet 4.5MiniMax M2.5 →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,524vs1,478
Coding Elo
1,531vs1,536
SWE-bench
70.1%vs75.8%
LiveBench
67.4%vs64.4%
GPQA Diamond
80.2%vs76.2%
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 3WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
88 tok/svs90 tok/s
Time to first token
240 msvs250 ms
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 1W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$15/1Mvs$0.9/1M
Input price
$3/1Mvs$0.22/1M
Context window
1Mvs205k
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Sonnet 4.5 3/6
Preference Elo

Claude Sonnet 4.5

46 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

MiniMax M2.5

2 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MiniMax M2.5

$14.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+3%1,524
EloHigh is better
1,478
Code Elo
High is better
1,531
Code EloHigh is better
1,536
LiveBench
High is better
+5%67.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
70.1%
SWE-benchHigh is better
75.8%+8%
GPQA
High is better
+5%80.2%
GPQAHigh is better
76.2%
TTFT
Low is better
+4%240 ms
TTFTLow is better
250 ms
Speed
High is better
88 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
90 tok/s+2%
In $
Low is better
$3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.22/1M+1264%
Out $
Low is better
$15/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.9/1M+1567%
Context
High is better
+388%1M
ContextHigh is better
205k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 94% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Sonnet 4.5$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
MiniMax M2.5$21.20 / mo
In: $7.70Out: $13.50
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $308.80/month ($3,706/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Sonnet 4.5:Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Claude Sonnet 4.5:Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4.5

Lower TTFT (240 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4.5

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Sonnet 4.5Lower TTFT (240 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Sonnet 4.5Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 18, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

Most of Opus 4.5 coding at a mid-tier price. Sonnet 5 replaced it as the buy; 4.5 remains a compare baseline.

launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Elo 1,524
LiveBench67.4%
SWE-bench70.1%
Speed88 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
LiveBench64.4%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,524). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 70.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $0.9/1M versus $15/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (240 ms vs 250 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts 1M tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 18, 2026

    Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the previous workhorse — still a valid vs baseline

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Sonnet 4.5 matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4 (previous sonnet)Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 (next sonnet)Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5