Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Command A vs Llama 4 Scout benchmark

Name: Command A vs Llama 4 Scout AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Command A (Cohere) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, Llama 4 Scout is ahead by 68 points (1,412 vs 1,344; lmarena (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Llama 4 Scout resolves 52.4% versus 42.6% (swebench (Aug 16, 2026)). Llama 4 Scout streams faster (155 tok/s) while Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper output token ($0.3/1M). Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Cohere

Command A

Cohere enterprise RAG and tool-use model.

Elo 1,344$10/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Command A (0)vsLlama 4 Scout (10)

Command A: 0W (0%)Overall: Llama 4 ScoutLlama 4 Scout: 10W (100%)

← Command ALlama 4 Scout →

Llama 4 Scout (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,344vs1,412

Coding Elo

—vs1,398

SWE-bench

42.6%vs52.4%

LiveBench

56.2%vs59.6%

GPQA Diamond

66%vs71.2%

Command A: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 5W

Llama 4 Scout (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

118 tok/svs155 tok/s

Time to first token

175 msvs130 ms

Command A: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 2W

Llama 4 Scout (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$10/1Mvs$0.3/1M

Input price

$2.5/1Mvs$0.1/1M

Context window

256kvs1.3M

Command A: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 3W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageLlama 4 Scout 6/6

Preference Elo

Llama 4 Scout

68 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Llama 4 Scout

37 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Llama 4 Scout

$9.70/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,344

EloHigh is better

1,412+5%

Code Elo

High is better

—

Code EloHigh is better

1,398

LiveBench

High is better

56.2%

LiveBenchHigh is better

59.6%+6%

SWE-bench

High is better

42.6%

SWE-benchHigh is better

52.4%+23%

GPQA

High is better

66%

GPQAHigh is better

71.2%+8%

TTFT

Low is better

175 ms

TTFTLow is better

130 ms+35%

Speed

High is better

118 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

155 tok/s+31%

In $

Low is better

$2.5/1M

In $Low is better

$0.1/1M+2400%

Out $

Low is better

$10/1M

Out $Low is better

$0.3/1M+3233%

Context

High is better

256k

ContextHigh is better

1.3M+412%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 97% with Llama 4 Scout

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Command A$237.50 / mo

In: $87.50Out: $150.00

Llama 4 Scout$8.00 / mo

In: $3.50Out: $4.50

Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 4 Scout is estimated to save $229.50/month ($2,754/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
3
Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsLlama 4 Scout

Higher SWE-bench (52.4%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Scout

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 Scout

Lower TTFT (130 ms).

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Scout

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionLlama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Llama 4 Scout	Higher SWE-bench (52.4%).
High-volume chat	Llama 4 Scout	Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Llama 4 Scout	Lower TTFT (130 ms).
Long-document RAG	Llama 4 Scout	Larger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / vision	Llama 4 Scout	Llama 4 Scout is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchMar 13, 2025

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Mar 2025. RAG and tools, not a frontier Elo play. Listed so “command a benchmark” has a sourced page.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/command-a-vs-llama-4-scout/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Cohere

Command A

Elo 1,344

LiveBench56.2%

SWE-bench42.6%

Speed118 tok/s

Output cost$10/1M

Llama 4 Scout

Elo 1,412

LiveBench59.6%

SWE-bench52.4%

Speed155 tok/s

Output cost$0.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?: Llama 4 Scout has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,412). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?: Llama 4 Scout leads SWE-bench at 52.4% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Llama 4 Scout output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?: Llama 4 Scout has the lower time-to-first-token (130 ms vs 175 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: Llama 4 Scout accepts 1.3M tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?: Llama 4 Scout is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and Llama 4 Scout Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Command A matchups →|All Llama 4 Scout matchups →

Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick (previous llama)Llama 3.1 405B vs Command A Llama 3.3 70B vs Command A Llama 3.1 70B vs Command A Mistral Large 3 vs Llama 4 Scout Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

Command A vs Llama 4 Scout benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Command A (0)vsLlama 4 Scout (10)

Command A: 0W (0%)Overall: Llama 4 ScoutLlama 4 Scout: 10W (100%)

← Command ALlama 4 Scout →

Llama 4 Scout (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,344vs1,412

Coding Elo

—vs1,398

SWE-bench

42.6%vs52.4%

LiveBench

56.2%vs59.6%

GPQA Diamond

66%vs71.2%

Command A: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 5W

Llama 4 Scout (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

118 tok/svs155 tok/s

Time to first token

175 msvs130 ms

Command A: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 2W

Llama 4 Scout (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$10/1Mvs$0.3/1M

Input price

$2.5/1Mvs$0.1/1M

Context window

256kvs1.3M

Command A: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 3W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsLlama 4 Scout

Higher SWE-bench (52.4%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Scout

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 Scout

Lower TTFT (130 ms).

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Scout

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionLlama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Llama 4 Scout	Higher SWE-bench (52.4%).
High-volume chat	Llama 4 Scout	Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Llama 4 Scout	Lower TTFT (130 ms).
Long-document RAG	Llama 4 Scout	Larger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / vision	Llama 4 Scout	Llama 4 Scout is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,412). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout leads SWE-bench at 52.4% vs 42.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Llama 4 Scout output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has the lower time-to-first-token (130 ms vs 175 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

Llama 4 Scout accepts 1.3M tokens versus 256k.

Can I self-host either model?

Llama 4 Scout is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Command A and Llama 4 Scout Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Command A

Llama 4 Scout

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Command A: Cohere’s enterprise RAG and tool-use row

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Command A

Llama 4 Scout

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons