CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Text-to-Image LeaderboardArena

FLUX.2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana, Midjourney

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Flagship frontier titan duel

Sonnet 5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V4

East vs West coding favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen3.8 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 4 Scout

Latest open-weights clash

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5

Generational upgrade (1 step back)

Opus 5 vs Opus 4.5

Anthropic generational delta

🎨 FLUX.2 Max vs GPT Image 2

Text-to-Image frontier leader

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Display Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. DeepSeek R1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

DeepSeek R1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo benchmark

This page compares DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (Zhipu) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. On preference Elo, Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is ahead by 117 points (1,475 vs 1,358; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, DeepSeek R1 resolves 65.2% versus 65.2% (swebench (Aug 17, 2026)). Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo streams faster (112 tok/s) while DeepSeek R1 is the cheaper output token ($2.5/1M). Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo has the larger context window (203k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

DeepSeek R1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo leads preference Elo (1,475 vs 1,358). DeepSeek R1 leads SWE-bench coding. DeepSeek R1 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Open-weights reasoning model trained with large-scale RL.

Elo 1,358$2.5/1M out

Zhipu

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (z-ai/glm-5v-turbo). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,475$4/1M out
DeepSeek R1 Inference Compute Profile
Inference-Time Compute & Reasoning EffortDynamic CoT

DeepSeek R1 Reasoning Scaler & Token Billing Simulator

Param: enable_reasoning

Reasoning models scale test-time compute by generating hidden chain-of-thought (CoT) tokens. These tokens are billed at standard output rates and directly expand latency (TTFT) in exchange for higher GPQA Diamond and SWE-bench Verified problem resolve rates.

Estimated TTFT
420 ms
1.0x (Standard eval)
CoT Thinking Tokens
~2,800
Billed as output tokens
Est. Cost / 1k Calls
$8.10
7.4x base invoice
STEM / SWE Boost
+6.5%
GPQA & SWE-bench scaling
Medium (Full RL CoT) Operational Profile

Standard large-scale RL reasoning trace with self-correction.

Direct Provider APIDeepSeek
"enable_reasoning": true
OpenRouter Unified APIUnified Gateway
"reasoning": {
  "effort": "medium",
  "max_tokens": 2800
}

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

DeepSeek R1 (3)vsZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (6)
DeepSeek R1: 3W (33%)Overall: Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 6W (67%)
← DeepSeek R11 tiesZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo →
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,358vs1,475
Coding Elo
—vs1,482
SWE-bench
65.2%vs65.2%
LiveBench
59%vs63.8%
GPQA Diamond
79.8%vs77.4%
DeepSeek R1: 1WZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 3W
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
62 tok/svs112 tok/s
Time to first token
420 msvs180 ms
DeepSeek R1: 0WZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 2W
DeepSeek R1 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$2.5/1Mvs$4/1M
Input price
$0.7/1Mvs$1.2/1M
Context window
64kvs203k
DeepSeek R1: 2WZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo 4/6
Preference Elo

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

117 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

50 tok/s faster

Token Price Efficiency

DeepSeek R1

$1.50/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,358
EloHigh is better
1,475+9%
Code Elo
High is better
—
Code EloHigh is better
1,482
LiveBench
High is better
59%
LiveBenchHigh is better
63.8%+8%
SWE-bench
High is better
65.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
65.2%
GPQA
High is better
+3%79.8%
GPQAHigh is better
77.4%
TTFT
Low is better
420 ms
TTFTLow is better
180 ms+133%
Speed
High is better
62 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
112 tok/s+81%
In $
Low is better
+71%$0.70 / 1M
In $Low is better
$1.20 / 1M
Out $
Low is better
+60%$2.50 / 1M
Out $Low is better
$4.00 / 1M
Context
High is better
64k
ContextHigh is better
203k+217%
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 39% with DeepSeek R1
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
DeepSeek R1$62.00 / mo
In: $24.5Out: $37.5
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo$102.00 / mo
In: $42Out: $60
Estimated Cost Delta

DeepSeek R1 is estimated to save $40.00/month ($480/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    DeepSeek R1:Pick DeepSeek R1 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo:Pick Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo:Pick Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek R1

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatDeepSeek R1

Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Lower TTFT (180 ms).

Long-document RAGZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Larger window (203k).

Screenshots / visionZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsDeepSeek R1Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chatDeepSeek R1Lower output list price ($2.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIZ.ai: GLM 5V TurboLower TTFT (180 ms).
Long-document RAGZ.ai: GLM 5V TurboLarger window (203k).
Screenshots / visionZ.ai: GLM 5V TurboZ.ai: GLM 5V Turbo is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJan 20, 2025

DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Jan 2025 reasoning model. Still searched. V4 Pro is the newer DeepSeek buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/deepseek-r1-vs-glm-5v-turbo/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Elo 1,358
LiveBench59%
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed62 tok/s
Output cost$2.5/1M
Zhipu

Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo

Elo 1,475
LiveBench63.8%
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed112 tok/s
Output cost$4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, DeepSeek R1 or Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,475). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, DeepSeek R1 or Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
DeepSeek R1 leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 65.2%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
DeepSeek R1 output tokens are $2.5/1M versus $4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 or Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo?
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo has the lower time-to-first-token (180 ms vs 420 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo accepts 203k tokens versus 64k.
Can I self-host either model?
DeepSeek R1 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. DeepSeek R1 and Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jan 20, 2025

    DeepSeek R1 stays as the open-weights RL baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All DeepSeek R1 matchups →|All Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo matchups →
DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3 (previous deepseek)DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (next deepseek)Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs GLM-5.2 (previous glm)Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo vs GLM-5.3 (next glm)DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5V TurboDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5V Turbo