Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026
In this head-to-head showdown, MiniMax M2.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,478 vs 1,295), while MiniMax M2.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (75.8%), while MiniMax M2.5 is more budget-friendly at $0.9/1M per 1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash provides faster response streaming (185 tok/s). Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.
MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.
Speed, cost, and intelligence tradeoffs across the Google lineup
Δ 183 Arena Elo pts
185 tok/s
$0.8999999999999999 / 1M output
Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | MiniMax M2.5 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Elo | MiniMax M2.5 (+183) | ||
| Coding Elo | — | — | |
| LiveBench | MiniMax M2.5 (+13%) | ||
| SWE-bench | MiniMax M2.5 (+27.8%) | ||
| GPQA Diamond | MiniMax M2.5 (+8%) | ||
| Time to first token | Gemini 2.5 Flash (+140 ms) | ||
| Output speed | 185 tok/s | 90 tok/s | Gemini 2.5 Flash (+95 tok/s) |
| Input price | $0.3/1M | $0.22/1M | MiniMax M2.5 (+$0.08/1M) |
| Output price | $2.5/1M | $0.9/1M | MiniMax M2.5 (+$1.6/1M) |
| Context window | Gemini 2.5 Flash (+844k) |
Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).
MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $26.80/month ($322/year).
Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Lower TTFT (110 ms).
Larger window (1M).
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | MiniMax M2.5 | Higher SWE-bench (75.8%). |
| High-volume chat | MiniMax M2.5 | Lower output list price ($0.9/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Lower TTFT (110 ms). |
| Long-document RAG | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Larger window (1M). |
| Screenshots / vision | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.
Useful as a cheap historical compare. 3.7 Flash is the 2026 volume SKU.
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-2-5-flash-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
