Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick benchmark

Name: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3.6 Flash is ahead by 38 points (1,506 vs 1,468; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash resolves 70.8% versus 57.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Gemini 3.6 Flash streams faster (198 tok/s) while Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper output token ($0.8/1M). Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google Jul 21 workhorse. Now shares the 3.7 Flash introductory $0.75/$3.75 rate through Dec 31 2026.

Elo 1,506$3.75/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (7)vsLlama 4 Maverick (2)

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 7W (78%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashLlama 4 Maverick: 2W (22%)

← Gemini 3.6 Flash1 tiesLlama 4 Maverick →

Gemini 3.6 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,506vs1,468

Coding Elo

1,514vs1,452

SWE-bench

70.8%vs57.1%

LiveBench

67.2%vs62.8%

GPQA Diamond

79.6%vs74.6%

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 5WLlama 4 Maverick: 0W

Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

198 tok/svs130 tok/s

Time to first token

92 msvs170 ms

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WLlama 4 Maverick: 0W

Llama 4 Maverick (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$3.75/1Mvs$0.8/1M

Input price

$0.75/1Mvs$0.2/1M

Context window

1Mvs1M

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0WLlama 4 Maverick: 2W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3.6 Flash 4/6

Preference Elo

Gemini 3.6 Flash

38 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3.6 Flash

68 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Llama 4 Maverick

$2.95/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

+3%1,506

EloHigh is better

1,468

Code Elo

High is better

+4%1,514

Code EloHigh is better

1,452

LiveBench

High is better

+7%67.2%

LiveBenchHigh is better

62.8%

SWE-bench

High is better

+24%70.8%

SWE-benchHigh is better

57.1%

GPQA

High is better

+7%79.6%

GPQAHigh is better

74.6%

TTFT

Low is better

+85%92 ms

TTFTLow is better

170 ms

Speed

High is better

+52%198 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

130 tok/s

In $

Low is better

$0.75/1M

In $Low is better

$0.2/1M+275%

Out $

Low is better

$3.75/1M

Out $Low is better

$0.8/1M+369%

Context

High is better

ContextHigh is better

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 77% with Llama 4 Maverick

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Gemini 3.6 Flash$82.50 / mo

In: $26.25Out: $56.25

Llama 4 Maverick$19.00 / mo

In: $7.00Out: $12.00

Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 4 Maverick is estimated to save $63.50/month ($762/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Llama 4 Maverick:Pick Llama 4 Maverick when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Gemini 3.6 Flash:Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Maverick

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 Flash

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.6 Flash).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).
High-volume chat	Llama 4 Maverick	Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Lower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAG	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.6 Flash).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

priceAug 13, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Jul 21 workhorse that inherited $0.75/$3.75 through year-end. Keep the row; 3.7 is the newer sibling.

compareApr 9, 2026

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Apr 2026. The Llama vs Claude hub uses the top Meta Elo row — usually Maverick.

launchDec 6, 2024

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-6-flash-vs-llama-4-maverick/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Elo 1,506

LiveBench67.2%

SWE-bench70.8%

Speed198 tok/s

Output cost$3.75/1M

Llama 4 Maverick

Elo 1,468

LiveBench62.8%

SWE-bench57.1%

Speed130 tok/s

Output cost$0.8/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?: Gemini 3.6 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,506). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?: Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench at 70.8% vs 57.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Llama 4 Maverick output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $3.75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?: Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 170 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?: Llama 4 Maverick is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3.6 Flash matchups →|All Llama 4 Maverick matchups →

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (next gemini-flash)Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B (previous llama)Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout (next llama)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3.6 Flash (7)vsLlama 4 Maverick (2)

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 7W (78%)Overall: Gemini 3.6 FlashLlama 4 Maverick: 2W (22%)

← Gemini 3.6 Flash1 tiesLlama 4 Maverick →

Gemini 3.6 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,506vs1,468

Coding Elo

1,514vs1,452

SWE-bench

70.8%vs57.1%

LiveBench

67.2%vs62.8%

GPQA Diamond

79.6%vs74.6%

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 5WLlama 4 Maverick: 0W

Gemini 3.6 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

198 tok/svs130 tok/s

Time to first token

92 msvs170 ms

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2WLlama 4 Maverick: 0W

Llama 4 Maverick (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$3.75/1Mvs$0.8/1M

Input price

$0.75/1Mvs$0.2/1M

Context window

1Mvs1M

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0WLlama 4 Maverick: 2W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3.6 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Maverick

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3.6 Flash

Lower TTFT (92 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3.6 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3.6 Flash

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.6 Flash).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Higher SWE-bench (70.8%).
High-volume chat	Llama 4 Maverick	Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Lower TTFT (92 ms).
Long-document RAG	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / vision	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3.6 Flash).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,506). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads SWE-bench at 70.8% vs 57.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Llama 4 Maverick output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $3.75/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 3.6 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (92 ms vs 170 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.

Can I self-host either model?

Llama 4 Maverick is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Llama 4 Maverick

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Llama 4 Maverick

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Llama 4 Maverick

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Gemini 3.6 Flash (Jul 21) now shares the 3.7 intro rate

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Llama 4 Maverick

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons