CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Quality & Reasoning
Overall Arena EloPrimary

LMSYS crowd human preference ranking

Coding Elo & SWE-benchCode

Real GitHub issue software solve rate

LiveBench Reasoning

Contamination-free automated tests

GPQA Diamond

PhD-level science & domain knowledge

Speed & Token Cost
Throughput (tok/s)Speed

Output generation token rate

Time to First Token (TTFT)

Response latency for voice & chat loops

Output Price ($/1M tokens)

Cost per million generated tokens

Live Pareto Frontier Scatter

Quality vs Cost efficiency boundary

Models
Model Classes
Frontier ModelsProprietary

Opus 4.5, GPT-5, Gemini 2.0 Pro

Open-Weight CatalogApache/MIT

Llama 3.3, DeepSeek, Qwen 2.5

🇨🇳 Chinese LLMsCN

DeepSeek V3, Qwen, GLM-5, MiniMax

Browse All 40+ Models
Top Providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5, Sonnet 4.5, Haiku

OpenAI

GPT-5, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, o3

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3, R1 Reasoning

Google

Gemini 2.0 Pro, Flash, Thinking

Compare
Popular Head-to-Head ShowdownsView all 48+ pairs →
🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3 vs 🇺🇸 GPT-5

East vs West frontier battle

Sonnet 4.5 vs 🇨🇳 DeepSeek V3

Everyday developer favorite

🇨🇳 Qwen 2.5 vs 🇺🇸 Llama 3.3

Open-weights value clash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5

Flagship proprietary duel

Open Interactive Comparison Matrix
Best of & Stacks
Best LLM Lists (2026)
Best Coding LLM

SWE-bench verified repository tests

Best Cheap LLM

Sub-$1/1M token value powerhouses

Fastest Low-Latency LLM

Sub-200ms TTFT for voice & live chat

Claude vs GPT Benchmark

Anthropic vs OpenAI head-to-head

Stack Engine Presets
Cheap Coding Agents

Budget repo bots with high SWE-bench

Lowest-Latency Chat

Fast interactive support loops

Open-Weight Reasoning

Self-hostable reasoning power

Explore All 11 Presets
Research & News
Intelligence & Telemetry
News & Benchmark BriefingsDispatches

Verified model promotions & price shifts

Hourly Benchmark ChangelogLive

Dated ingest audit trail with exact diffs

Evaluation Methodology

Standardized scoring formulas & harnesses

What is Arena Elo?

Understanding blind pairwise human ratings

…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown
Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown
compareVerified Dispatch
CompareLLM Intelligence Desk·Apr 9, 2026

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.

Search intent: llama vs claude

Evaluated Models:Llama 4 Maverick(Meta)Claude Opus 5(Anthropic)Claude Opus 4.5(Anthropic)Claude Opus 4.6(Anthropic)Claude Opus 4.8(Anthropic)Claude 3 Opus(Anthropic)Claude Opus 4(Anthropic)Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7(Anthropic)Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1(Anthropic)
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit
Verified Benchmark Scorecard9 Models Evaluated

Multi-Model Benchmark Matrix: Llama 4 Maverick, Claude Opus 5, Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude 3 Opus, Claude Opus 4, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1

Live benchmark scores, throughput speeds, and token pricing with dynamic peer comparison.

LMSYS Arena Elo1,468Llama 4 Maverick
SWE-bench Verified57.1%Coding issue resolve %
Throughput Speed130 tokens/secGeneration rate
Output Price / 1M tokens$0.80Standard list rate

98% Output Token Cost Advantage

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.80 / 1M tokens compared to Claude Opus 5 at $50.00 / 1M tokens ($49.20/1M tokens difference).

Interactive Model Comparison:9 models selected
Llama 4 MaverickArticleClaude Opus 5ArticleClaude Opus 4.5ArticleClaude Opus 4.6ArticleClaude Opus 4.8ArticleClaude 3 OpusArticleClaude Opus 4ArticleAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.7ArticleAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.1Article
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
quality
Llama 4 Maverick
1,468
Claude Opus 5Best
1,624
Claude Opus 4.5
1,568
Claude Opus 4.6
1,574
Claude Opus 4.8
1,598
Claude 3 Opus
1,248
Claude Opus 4
1,490
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
Coding EloProgramming preference
quality
Llama 4 Maverick
1,452
Claude Opus 5Best
1,618
Claude Opus 4.5
1,574
Claude Opus 4.6
1,570
Claude Opus 4.8
1,604
Claude 3 Opus
—
Claude Opus 4
1,502
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
quality
Llama 4 Maverick
57.1%
Claude Opus 5Best
79.2%
Claude Opus 4.5
76.8%
Claude Opus 4.6
75.9%
Claude Opus 4.8
78.4%
Claude 3 Opus
38.4%
Claude Opus 4
72.5%
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
quality
Llama 4 Maverick
74.6%
Claude Opus 5Best
87.1%
Claude Opus 4.5
84.1%
Claude Opus 4.6
84.8%
Claude Opus 4.8
86.2%
Claude 3 Opus
50.4%
Claude Opus 4
80.4%
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
quality
Llama 4 Maverick
62.8%
Claude Opus 5Best
74.8%
Claude Opus 4.5
71.2%
Claude Opus 4.6
72%
Claude Opus 4.8
73.6%
Claude 3 Opus
46.2%
Claude Opus 4
66.8%
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
speed
Llama 4 MaverickBest
130 tok/s
Claude Opus 5
72 tok/s
Claude Opus 4.5
62 tok/s
Claude Opus 4.6
64 tok/s
Claude Opus 4.8
66 tok/s
Claude 3 Opus
48 tok/s
Claude Opus 4
58 tok/s
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
speed
Llama 4 MaverickBest
170 ms
Claude Opus 5
310 ms
Claude Opus 4.5
380 ms
Claude Opus 4.6
360 ms
Claude Opus 4.8
330 ms
Claude 3 Opus
420 ms
Claude Opus 4
390 ms
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
—
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
—
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
price
Llama 4 MaverickBest
$0.8/1M
Claude Opus 5
$50/1M
Claude Opus 4.5
$25/1M
Claude Opus 4.6
$25/1M
Claude Opus 4.8
$25/1M
Claude 3 Opus
$75/1M
Claude Opus 4
$75/1M
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
$25/1M
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
$75/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
price
Llama 4 MaverickBest
$0.2/1M
Claude Opus 5
$10/1M
Claude Opus 4.5
$5/1M
Claude Opus 4.6
$5/1M
Claude Opus 4.8
$5/1M
Claude 3 Opus
$15/1M
Claude Opus 4
$15/1M
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
$5/1M
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
$15/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
capacity
Llama 4 MaverickBest
1M
Claude Opus 5
1M
Claude Opus 4.5
200k
Claude Opus 4.6
1M
Claude Opus 4.8
1M
Claude 3 Opus
200k
Claude Opus 4
200k
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
1M
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1
200k
Benchmark / Metric
Llama 4 MaverickMeta · Article Model
Claude Opus 5Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · Article Model
Claude 3 OpusAnthropic · Article Model
Claude Opus 4Anthropic · Article Model
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic · Article Model
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic · Article Model
LMSYS Arena EloOverall human preference
1,468
1,624Top
1,568
1,574
1,598
1,248
1,490
—
—
Coding EloProgramming preference
1,452
1,618Top
1,574
1,570
1,604
—
1,502
—
—
SWE-bench VerifiedGitHub issue resolve %
57.1%
79.2%Top
76.8%
75.9%
78.4%
38.4%
72.5%
—
—
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science reasoning %
74.6%
87.1%Top
84.1%
84.8%
86.2%
50.4%
80.4%
—
—
LiveBenchContamination-free reasoning
62.8%
74.8%Top
71.2%
72%
73.6%
46.2%
66.8%
—
—
Throughput (Speed)Output tokens / second
130 tok/sTop
72 tok/s
62 tok/s
64 tok/s
66 tok/s
48 tok/s
58 tok/s
—
—
Time-to-First-TokenInitial latency (ms)
170 msTop
310 ms
380 ms
360 ms
330 ms
420 ms
390 ms
—
—
Output Token Price$ per 1M reply tokens
$0.8/1MTop
$50/1M
$25/1M
$25/1M
$25/1M
$75/1M
$75/1M
$25/1M
$75/1M
Input Token Price$ per 1M prompt tokens
$0.2/1MTop
$10/1M
$5/1M
$5/1M
$5/1M
$15/1M
$15/1M
$5/1M
$15/1M
Context WindowMax token capacity
1MTop
1M
200k
1M
1M
200k
200k
1M
200k
Executive Key Takeaway
Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.

Llama vs Claude is the open-vs-closed brand query. The hub remaps to the current top Meta Elo row versus the current top Anthropic Elo row — usually Llama 4 Maverick vs Opus 5. If you need weights, Llama is in the conversation even when it loses Elo. If you need the current coding crown, start on Claude and pay the list.

Weights are the product feature

A 40-point Elo gap can be the wrong reason to stay closed if you must fine-tune or air-gap. That decision is not in the table. The table still keeps you honest about quality.

Empirical Evaluation & Architectural Analysis

Standardized telemetry recorded in the verified CompareLLM Leaderboards captures distinct architectural priorities between Llama 4 Maverick and Claude Opus 5. While blind human pairwise preference testing reflects instruction compliance and reasoning depth, domain-specific suites such as SWE-bench Verified and GPQA Diamond highlight coding execution and advanced STEM reasoning. For the live pairwise breakdown with historical trendlines, reference the interactive scorecard above or visit the Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude Opus 5 Showdown.

Scout vs Haiku is the cheap remix

Same brands, different SKUs. Don’t let this hub steal that query.

Strategic Deployment Recommendation

  • Production Workloads: For enterprise workloads requiring strict reliability, cross-reference Top Coding LLMs and Cheapest High-Quality LLMs.
  • Direct Pair Comparison: Explore the live pairwise breakdown at /best/llama-vs-claude-benchmark.
  • Architectural Stacks: Recommended architectural configurations can be evaluated on the CompareLLM Stack Engine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this an CompareLLM lab test score? No. Linked model dossiers and compare showdowns reflect dated snapshots gathered from named public evaluation benchmarks. Seed catalog entries remain transparently timestamped until daily ingest updates them.

Where can I see live comparisons for this model? View the showdown at /best/llama-vs-claude-benchmark.

What primary search query does this briefing answer? llama vs claude.

Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Head-to-Head Showdowns for Mentioned Models

Featured Article ShowdownLlama 4 Maverick vs Claude Opus 5
Compare Benchmarks
Benchmark MatchupLlama 4 Maverick vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Benchmark MatchupLlama 4 Maverick vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3 Opus vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude 3 Opus vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupClaude Opus 4 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 mini
Benchmark MatchupAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5
Benchmark MatchupAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5 mini

Related news

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

  • launch · Jun 20, 2026

    Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

  • compare · Aug 10, 2026

    Sonnet vs Opus in 2026: same family, different invoice

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs Gemini: coding, Elo, and output price — not a brand mashup

Back to All DispatchesExplore Comparison Matrix