CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5.2

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5.2 benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3 Flash (Google) and GLM-5.2 (Zhipu) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3 Flash is ahead by 3 points (1,495 vs 1,492; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3 Flash resolves 75.8% versus 69.3% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Gemini 3 Flash streams faster (190 tok/s) while GLM-5.2 is the cheaper output token ($0.97/1M). Gemini 3 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-5.2 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 3 Flash leads preference Elo (1,495 vs 1,492). Gemini 3 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. GLM-5.2 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Fast Google frontier-adjacent model. Near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus price.

Elo 1,495$3/1M out

Zhipu

GLM-5.2

Zhipu flagship. Strong Chinese/English coding and agents.

Elo 1,492$0.9680000000000001/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3 Flash (6)vsGLM-5.2 (3)
Gemini 3 Flash: 6W (67%)Overall: Gemini 3 FlashGLM-5.2: 3W (33%)
← Gemini 3 Flash1 tiesGLM-5.2 →
Gemini 3 Flash (4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,495vs1,492
Coding Elo
1,510vs1,504
SWE-bench
75.8%vs69.3%
LiveBench
66.8%vs65.2%
GPQA Diamond
78.4%vs79.5%
Gemini 3 Flash: 4WGLM-5.2: 1W
Gemini 3 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
190 tok/svs84 tok/s
Time to first token
95 msvs270 ms
Gemini 3 Flash: 2WGLM-5.2: 0W
GLM-5.2 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$3/1Mvs$0.97/1M
Input price
$0.5/1Mvs$0.31/1M
Context window
1Mvs1M
Gemini 3 Flash: 0WGLM-5.2: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3 Flash 3/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 3 Flash

3 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3 Flash

106 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

GLM-5.2

$2.03/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,495
EloHigh is better
1,492
Code Elo
High is better
1,510
Code EloHigh is better
1,504
LiveBench
High is better
+2%66.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
65.2%
SWE-bench
High is better
+9%75.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
69.3%
GPQA
High is better
78.4%
GPQAHigh is better
79.5%+1%
TTFT
Low is better
+184%95 ms
TTFTLow is better
270 ms
Speed
High is better
+126%190 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
84 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$0.5/1M
In $Low is better
$0.31/1M+62%
Out $
Low is better
$3/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.97/1M+210%
Context
High is better
1M
ContextHigh is better
1M
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 60% with GLM-5.2
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3 Flash$62.50 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $45.00
GLM-5.2$25.30 / mo
In: $10.78Out: $14.52
Estimated Cost Delta

GLM-5.2 is estimated to save $37.20/month ($446/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    GLM-5.2:Pick GLM-5.2 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatGLM-5.2

Lower output list price ($0.97/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 Flash

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3 Flash

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3 Flash).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 FlashHigher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatGLM-5.2Lower output list price ($0.97/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 FlashLower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3 FlashBoth accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Gemini 3 Flash).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
newsAug 16, 2026

GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

GLM-5.2 undercuts GLM 5V Turbo by 74.2% on input at $0.31/1M, with 1,492 Elo and 69.3% SWE-bench in dated 2026 snapshots.

launchJun 18, 2026

GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

Strong Chinese/English coding. 5.3 is the new row; 5.2 stays so the delta is visible.

launchMar 16, 2026

Gemini 3 Flash: near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus

March 2026 speed SKU. Still a useful cheap-coding compare even after 3.6/3.7 Flash.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-flash-vs-glm-5-2/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Elo 1,495
LiveBench66.8%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed190 tok/s
Output cost$3/1M
Zhipu

GLM-5.2

Elo 1,492
LiveBench65.2%
SWE-bench69.3%
Speed84 tok/s
Output cost$0.97/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-5.2?
Gemini 3 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,495). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-5.2?
Gemini 3 Flash leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 69.3%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
GLM-5.2 output tokens are $0.97/1M versus $3/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3 Flash or GLM-5.2?
Gemini 3 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 1M.
Can I self-host either model?
GLM-5.2 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3 Flash and GLM-5.2 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • news · Aug 16, 2026

    GLM-5.2 vs GLM 5V Turbo Price and SWE-bench 2026

  • launch · Jun 18, 2026

    GLM-5.2 remains the prior Zhipu flagship for upgrade pairs

  • launch · Mar 16, 2026

    Gemini 3 Flash: near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3 Flash matchups →|All GLM-5.2 matchups →
Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (next gemini-flash)GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3 (next glm)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GLM-5.2Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Pro vs Gemini 3 Flash